|
|
Posted by dorayme on 11/05/07 20:58
In article
<1194261165.957034.42220@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>,
Travis Newbury <TravisNewbury@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 4, 8:51 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > You wanted to know what I mean when I say a table can't be fluid. I
> > > gave you an example.
> > Look, it seems that we are on different wavelengths here.
>
> I believe Jerry just likes to pick fights. You are wasting your time
> here Jerry is a closed minded buffoon. He fears what he does not
> understand
I was - naively I guess - hoping to get him to define a few
things so that the exchanges could actually be a bit informative
to whoever might read them on usenet. I suspect he is simply not
prepared to do the hard work of rubbing some words together.
The fact is that many table layouts are very fluid in all sorts
of good senses. There are some deeper senses in which they are
not - to do with platform and device variations. And there are
other senses in which they are not as easy to update, rearrange
or adapt as templates. But none of this stuff is he interested in
even listing (never mind explaining), hurling abuse, saying as
little as possible and oozing hints of knowledge and authority is
more his game. And ever ready with his oft repeated accusations
of trolling by people who do not fall into line with him quietly.
There is indeed a strong argument that people like him have a
fair number of the characteristics of a troll than those he
accuses.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|