| 
	
 | 
 Posted by 1001 Webs on 11/06/07 22:40 
On Nov 6, 11:20 pm, "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohn...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> On 2007-11-06, 1001 Webs wrote: 
> 
> 
> 
> > On Nov 6, 10:01 pm, "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohn...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >> On 2007-11-06, 1001 Webs wrote: 
> >> > On Nov 6, 8:50 pm, "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohn...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >> ... 
> >> >>    It is not hard to do the right thing with CSS. It is, perhaps, too 
> >> >>    easy to do the wrong thing. 
> 
> >> > That's the problem as I see it too. 
> >> > For example. there are too many options just to assign font-size. 
> >> > Why, in the name of God don't they stick to percentages or whatever? 
> >> > , but c'mmon this is just absurd 
> >> > Or a conspiracy ... 
> >> > BTW, right now I am rewriting my style sheet with font-size: small; 
> >> > etc., but I'm not that sure it will render well I I 
> 
> >> > have copied it from w3.org's front page: 
> >> >http://www.w3.org 
> 
> >> > I can't go wrong that way, right? 
> 
> >>    Right, if you use it the way they do, which means not for regular 
> >>    text. They use it only for things such as copyright notices and 
> >>    legalese. 
> 
> > I have to settle for something. 
> 
>    No, you don't. 
Uh? 
 
> > What's your advice? 
> 
>    Don't use anything; it's unnecessary. 
Beg your pardon? 
 
> > I tried with percentages and didn't look right, but I wasn't taking 
> > into account inheritance ... 
> 
>    URL? 
http://www.1001webs.net 
The style sheet comes from a Template supplied by a third party. 
Problem is that I have to use it for the front end if I want it to 
look exactly the same as the backend (a phpCOIN installation), so that 
it is consistent with the overall look of the site when a customer 
logs in. 
 
> > Many people recommends percentages for html/body as a "global" setting 
> > and then using ems from then on. 
> 
>    The biggest mistake in CSS is specifying too much. 
 
Then you're going to LOVE this style sheet; 
http://www.1001webs.net/en/styles.css
 
  
Navigation:
[Reply to this message] 
 |