Posted by Bone Ur on 11/08/07 01:50

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:45:47 GMT
richard scribed:

>>> But here's one idea I had played with.
>>>
>>> <table><tr><td>item1</td><td>item2</td><td>item3</td></tr></table>
>>> <table>
>>> <tr>January</td>
>>> <tr><td>1</td><td>8</td><td>15</td><td>22</td><td>29</td></tr>
>>> <tr><td>99</td><td>99</td><td>99</td><td>99</td><td>99</td></tr>
>>> </table>
>>>
>>> Multiply that 1000 times and you soon see just how huge of a page that
>>> would be. I would not be showing all 12 months, at the most, maybe 6.
>>>
>>> <flame>
>>
>> Er, 1000 times what you've shown would be 1000 months, not 6. Math
>> impaired?
>
> Yes you are apparently.
> I was speaking of 1,000 times the data shown, not months.

Oh, I see. -Grammar impaired.

--
Bone Ur
Cavemen have formidable pheromones.

• Next in forum: Re: how to best approach a massive list?
• Prev in forum: Re: Is the end of HTML as we know it?
• Thread view: Re: how to best approach a massive list?

[Reply to this message]