Posted by Els on 11/09/07 07:59

dorayme wrote:

> In article <47337daf$1@clear.net.nz>,
> "Nik Coughlin" <nrkn.com@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[snip]
> This is not really correct because the idea is that the
> thumbnails are an expansion of the item Tribute. Your
> alternative, below, is correct but it is not pedantic.

[snip example where the nested ul is inside the list element
*following* the Tribute list element]

I'll be pedantic then ;-), and say it is not correct. If the
thumbnails are indeed an expansion of the item Tribute, the list would
look like this:

<li><a href="#">Tribute</a>
<ul id="thumbnail">
<li><a href="#"><img src="images/photography/1.jpg" /></a></li>
<li><a href="#"><img src="images/photography/2.jpg" /></a></li>
<li><a href="#"><img src="images/photography/3.jpg" /></a></li>
<li><a href="#"><img src="images/photography/4.jpg" /></a></li>
<li><a href="#"><img src="images/photography/5.jpg" /></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="#">Cloud 9</a></li>


--
Els http://locusmeus.com/

• Next in forum: Re: position absolute different in IE than firefox, help!
• Prev in forum: Re: Is the end of HTML as we know it?
• Thread view: Re: Is this good code? Good practice advice needed...

[Reply to this message]