|
|
Posted by Chaddy2222 on 11/12/07 12:56
On Nov 12, 9:52 pm, "rf" <r...@invalid.com> wrote:
> <posting from alt.html>
>
> "1001 Webs" <1001w...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1194861559.991818.201540@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Either of two, you're not blind or you don't have any consideration
> > for real blind people.
>
> I let you out of my killfile for a few minutes and this is what rubbish
> appears.
>
> First of all, Chaddy is legally blind. That does not mean his eyes do not
> work at all, just that his sight is impared such that he is not legally
> obliged to actually see things. You should read up on the legislation in
> your own country and in ours (Australia) before casting such black and white
> assertions. Then again don't, you probably would not understand it anyway.
>
> Chaddy's visual acuity is not good but is enough to see his screen in
> general and to have a feel about what is hapenning on it. It's like looking
> through some translucant showerscreen glass I believe (Is that right
> Chaddy?). Chaddy uses assistive technology to respond in this and many other
> newsgroups, one of the reasons his spelling is so bad :-) but we who know
> him do not care about this and even enjoy and joke about it, and I am sure
> Chaddy enjoys the odd such joke.
>
> So, Chaddy is quite well (and mind you blindness, or rather visual
> imparment, or whatever Chaddy likes to call his, is not an illness) able to
> produce web sites. I have followed his main web site for several years and
> find it to be an inspiration. We, who know him, offer critical (in the true
> sense of the word, constructructively critical) advice and he is pleased by
> this. Chaddy also often offers some rather critical advice to others,
> particularly from his visual viewpoint. For this we are gratefull and we
> learn from this. I am sure the recipients of that advice are also gratefull.
> It is good to hear what ones web site looks like, and operates like, to
> someone like Chaddy.
>
> I have not viewed any of his flash work, as I don't do flash, but I expect
> it to be a similar standard.
>
Hmmmm, it's not bad, i'll probably do some work on it soon though just
to tidy it up a bit.
> As to Spheric, aka Trevor, who used to go by another handle, I have seen him
> here as well for a long time, prior to his hiatus. While I do not interact
> much with him, other than to note his designs go by from time to time (with
> the odd critique from myself and, of course Chaddy) I respect him as a
> contributor to this newsgroup, and others.
>
Thanks.
> Now, as to you.
>
> After having a bit of a run-in with Chaddy (which I still have not found,
> but I suspect it was just Chaddy stating (as we all do) that your sites
> suck) and having your balls chopped off my just about everybody who matters
> to the "regulars" in this group you start off a thread likening Chaddys work
> to that of how many children. I have just looked at some of these sites (for
> the first time) and I am willing to say that some of them look OK. Some of
> them are actually quite good, visually. Many however do not look OK. None of
> them are up to the standard required by this group and none of them, as far
> as I can tell, are up to the professional standard exhibited by Chaddy,
> Trevor, or any of the other "regulars" in this group, especially in regard
> to (funnily enough) accessibility.
>
Oh well that's a surprise.
> <aside>
> I just visited every site you offered up.
What are you just really bord or what? siriously!
>
> Every one of them fails in some way. Images of test. "Click here". Flags
> indicating countries. Fixed width. All of the things this and other
> newsgroups would frown upon.
> </aside>
>
Lets just say my dealings with umm school teachers and web design have
not always been in the favor of decent design such as following the
proper recommendations etc.
> When Chaddys situation was revealed to you you called yourself a bloody
> arsehole and indicated you would not return.
>
Yeah, I got a bit excited by that prospect just quietly!.
> You lied. You are still here. You are still attacking people whom you know
> exactly nothing about except from what you may discern from their posts
> here. Without knowing anything else about them.
>
> You truly are a bloody arsehole. One usenet would be better off without.
>
Yeah I would prefer "The Hatter" anyday compaired to this cluless GIT
of a hack.
> Note: You will not get me into a Stukle pissing contest over this. Blather
> away. I am listening with beer in hand waiting for your next out of your
> arse statement.
>
> Have a good rest of your life.
>
BTW it was funny for about ahh half a second.
Oh yeah look for a thread called on the search or looking for papers
or something, I really can't be arsed looking it up and I really could
not be stuffed dealing with this 1001 hack anymore I mean it's just
not werth the effort.
KILL FILE IT FOR GOD SAKE!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|