|
|
Posted by 1001 Webs on 11/12/07 13:29
On Nov 12, 1:56 pm, Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-
sicur...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> On Nov 12, 9:52 pm, "rf" <r...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
> > <posting from alt.html>
>
> > "1001 Webs" <1001w...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:1194861559.991818.201540@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > Either of two, you're not blind or you don't have any consideration
> > > for real blind people.
>
> > I let you out of my killfile for a few minutes and this is what rubbish
> > appears.
>
> > First of all, Chaddy is legally blind. That does not mean his eyes do not
> > work at all, just that his sight is impared such that he is not legally
> > obliged to actually see things. You should read up on the legislation in
> > your own country and in ours (Australia) before casting such black and white
> > assertions. Then again don't, you probably would not understand it anyway.
>
> > Chaddy's visual acuity is not good but is enough to see his screen in
> > general and to have a feel about what is hapenning on it. It's like looking
> > through some translucant showerscreen glass I believe (Is that right
> > Chaddy?). Chaddy uses assistive technology to respond in this and many other
> > newsgroups, one of the reasons his spelling is so bad :-) but we who know
> > him do not care about this and even enjoy and joke about it, and I am sure
> > Chaddy enjoys the odd such joke.
>
> > So, Chaddy is quite well (and mind you blindness, or rather visual
> > imparment, or whatever Chaddy likes to call his, is not an illness) able to
> > produce web sites. I have followed his main web site for several years and
> > find it to be an inspiration. We, who know him, offer critical (in the true
> > sense of the word, constructructively critical) advice and he is pleased by
> > this. Chaddy also often offers some rather critical advice to others,
> > particularly from his visual viewpoint. For this we are gratefull and we
> > learn from this. I am sure the recipients of that advice are also gratefull.
> > It is good to hear what ones web site looks like, and operates like, to
> > someone like Chaddy.
>
> > I have not viewed any of his flash work, as I don't do flash, but I expect
> > it to be a similar standard.
>
> Hmmmm, it's not bad, i'll probably do some work on it soon though just
> to tidy it up a bit.
>
> > As to Spheric, aka Trevor, who used to go by another handle, I have seen him
> > here as well for a long time, prior to his hiatus. While I do not interact
> > much with him, other than to note his designs go by from time to time (with
> > the odd critique from myself and, of course Chaddy) I respect him as a
> > contributor to this newsgroup, and others.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > Now, as to you.
>
> > After having a bit of a run-in with Chaddy (which I still have not found,
> > but I suspect it was just Chaddy stating (as we all do) that your sites
> > suck) and having your balls chopped off my just about everybody who matters
> > to the "regulars" in this group you start off a thread likening Chaddys work
> > to that of how many children. I have just looked at some of these sites (for
> > the first time) and I am willing to say that some of them look OK. Some of
> > them are actually quite good, visually. Many however do not look OK. None of
> > them are up to the standard required by this group and none of them, as far
> > as I can tell, are up to the professional standard exhibited by Chaddy,
> > Trevor, or any of the other "regulars" in this group, especially in regard
> > to (funnily enough) accessibility.
>
> Oh well that's a surprise.
>
> > <aside>
> > I just visited every site you offered up.
>
> What are you just really bord or what? siriously!
>
>
>
> > Every one of them fails in some way. Images of test. "Click here". Flags
> > indicating countries. Fixed width. All of the things this and other
> > newsgroups would frown upon.
> > </aside>
>
> Lets just say my dealings with umm school teachers and web design have
> not always been in the favor of decent design such as following the
> proper recommendations etc.
>
> > When Chaddys situation was revealed to you you called yourself a bloody
> > arsehole and indicated you would not return.
>
> Yeah, I got a bit excited by that prospect just quietly!.
>
> > You lied. You are still here. You are still attacking people whom you know
> > exactly nothing about except from what you may discern from their posts
> > here. Without knowing anything else about them.
>
> > You truly are a bloody arsehole. One usenet would be better off without.
>
> Yeah I would prefer "The Hatter" anyday compaired to this cluless GIT
> of a hack.
>
> > Note: You will not get me into a Stukle pissing contest over this. Blather
> > away. I am listening with beer in hand waiting for your next out of your
> > arse statement.
>
> > Have a good rest of your life.
>
> BTW it was funny for about ahh half a second.
> Oh yeah look for a thread called on the search or looking for papers
> or something, I really can't be arsed looking it up and I really could
> not be stuffed dealing with this 1001 hack anymore I mean it's just
> not werth the effort.
> KILL FILE IT FOR GOD SAKE!
Not so fast Chaddy.
You still have a lot of explaining to do, specially if your
unsupported claim of "legal blindness" has landed you any paid job.
If you have lied about your condition, you have committed FRAUD.
1-
a: deceit, trickery; specifically : intentional perversion of truth in
order to induce another to part with something of value or to
surrender a legal right
b: an act of deceiving or misrepresenting : trick
2-
a: a person who is not what he or she pretends to be : impostor;
also : one who defrauds : cheat
b: one that is not what it seems or is represented to be.
And FRAUD, dear Shabby666, is a CRIME.
And the penalties you are facing for committing such a despicable
CRIME range from $100,000.00 to imprisonment for up to three years, or
both.
Maybe in Australia are even harder.
We are all expectant now.
It shouldn't be that hard to present some proof of your alleged
blindness.
If you don't present any, we'll have to assume that you have been
lying and cheating on people during all this time, just like you lie
and cheat on real blind people when you claim to "specialise in making
websites that are accessible to the widest range of people possible":
http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz/index.php
but then go on to say that "you will need the Flash Player to *view*
the below content":
http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz/portfolio.php
So you're basically asking for compassion, while at the same time
denying accessibility to the people you claim to be helping.
Perhaps because you know that you can't get any money out of those
people?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|