|
|
Posted by VUNETdotUS on 11/20/07 20:33
On Nov 20, 3:23 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> In article
> <ff8b7d53-1637-48df-b4da-1a71792c1...@d61g2000hsa.googlegroups.co
> m>,
>
>
>
> VUNETdotUS <vunet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 20, 2:25 pm, dorayme wrote:
> > > VUNETdotUSwrote:
> > > > Herehttp://www.vunet.us/wic/test/top.aspyouwill see a very wide
> > > > (outside the screen) div with id="middle" (red color border). This
> > > > never happens in IE6+, FF.
>
> > > You put up a transitional doctype doc, it does not validate and
> > > the errors can be seen viahttp://validator.w3.org/and
> > > athttp://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
>
> > > Best to fix these before peering into the murky waters of IE size
> > > calculations.
>
> > Yes, thanks. But they are topmargin, leftmargin in BODY tag or omitted
> > ALT tag. Is this is a serious problem?
>
> I only saw the number of errors and the first one (which you omit
> to ask if it is serious) before replying. The first listed was:
>
> Line 8, Column 6: required attribute "TYPE" not specified.
>
> <style>
>
> The attribute given above is required for an element that you've
> used, but you have omitted it. For instance, in most HTML and
> XHTML document types the "type" attribute is required on the
> "script" element
>
> I was just remarking on it, and thinking that if someone was able
> to look into IE 5 and your code, it would encourage them if you
> had your mark up kosher. Given you are obviously a keen css
> stylesheeter, what motivated you to include those layout
> instructions in <body...>? You using a generator?
>
> --
> dorayme
historically I kept body attributes and left unchanged since there was
not conflict with modern browsers. I will remove attributes but I
suspect this is not the problem. Thanks.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|