|
|
Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 11/23/07 14:58
Mika wrote:
> "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote in message
> news:e37c0$47460860$40cba7b0$2973@NAXS.COM...
>> It's a "Spruce Goose", but we informed them that almost to years ago, but
>> whatever we say now won't matter they are too deeply committed without an
>> "exit strategy"
>
> We are flattered you talk about this like it is a big business. It is just
> a hobby done in spare time! We think we have done quite well considering
> that being beginners, and that we have incurred little or no startup
> expenses. The site is accessed by thousands of repeat visitors monthly.
Don't flatter yourself too much, I was referring to your mindset to your
project. The product of your industry is self-revealing.
>
>>> You've posted your site in the past, and as I recall, each time someone
>>> told you of problems, not the least of which was load times.
>>>
>> Last time I check it was over 6MB...
>
> 6MB is not a load time. This site is clearly labelled as being for the
> broadband generation. It says 'broadband recommended' on every page, and in
> search engine listings, and the FAQ. 84% of the UK is now on broadband and
> this is a UK oriented site. 6MB is about 2 seconds. Clearly that is not
> really an issue to keep criticising the site for. As speeds increase this
> will only become even less of an issue.
>
> This thread was about a Google/MS issue, but we appreciate any
> 'constructive' polite comments.
>
>> your page is patchwork Frankenstein
>
> Unlike that.
Denying real fundamental flaws in application and design does not make
those flaws go away.
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|