|
Posted by Bone Ur on 11/25/07 18:25
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Sun, 25 Nov 2007 06:40:50
GMT Blinky the Shark scribed:
>>> Worthless? Worthless?! If it weren't for us, the world (well the
>>> oceans) would be crawling with groupers...and you know how bad that
>>> would be from seeing the Google variety all over usenet.
>>
>> Well, I was grouping groupers into the same category; they are fish,
>> too. However, for _you_ to denigrate groupers is
>> intra-phylum-discrimination.
>
> And that's not prohibited. Especially here, high on the food chain.
> :)
High and complacent. Read on...
>> Furthermore, I don't think all fish are equally worthless. Those
>> cute little colorful ones which reside in home aquariums can be
>> relaxing in a hypnotic way to the duller mind. But the big ones that
>> eat people and
>
> But it takes 500 of them just to make a snack.
They're a delicacy. You're only supposed to eat a few at a time.
>> other fish I may want to eat serve little purpose to a progressive,
>> advanced society.
>
> We've been evolving longer than you have. And we're not making holes
> in the ozone layer. ;)
Longer but slower. Much slower. As a matter of fact, sharks in
particular pretty much hit a dead stop prior to the beginning of the Age
of Dinosaurs. Ergo, for the last 200+ million years, all they do is swim
around and take up space in the sea just like their forefishies did in
the good ol' Triassic. Humans, on the other hand, evolved at least 1000
times as much in the most current 5 million years alone! Fish have
little reason to brag, -especially when one considers how ugly they are.
--
Bone Ur
Cavemen have formidable pheromones.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|