|
|
Posted by Mika on 11/28/07 22:05
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:wgk3j.59126$if6.59058@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Mika wrote:
>
>> That's interesting... no reply.
>
> Sorry, I was away from home for most of the day. I guess that's
> interesting.
Now lying to cover your inability to admit when you should have trusted what
we said about Opera? I wrote the above message at 12:18 BST. You were here
responding to others at 13:13 BST. Funny how you answered other topics but
not ours where you were proved wrong.
Oh God I just realised I'm starting to sound like you guys! Better stop
this habit fast before I end up like some in this group for years spouting
the same old nonsense! :P
>> You guys are like a rottweiler with a bone when you think you're right
>> about something and often turn to pack bullying, but as soon as you
>> realise you were wrong you just back away quietly without a word.
>
> <guffaw>
Oh it is funny, not without a word, you typed lots of words to other people
just not to me.
>> People would have so much more respect if you were humble and mature
>> enough to say, "Apologies, what you said is true". It's good advice,
>> take it or leave it though.
>
> So tell me then why Opera seems to work on George Street?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
*STILL* you're making us explain ourselves? You could have just kept shshed
and took our word for it that we knew what we were talking about, but now
you want even more justifications for something we never even asked you to
comment on?! :O
George Street is tiny. Oxford Street is huge. Therefore, George Street
never hits Opera's limitation, wherease Oxford Street does before you get
halfway.
Again, you didn't need to know this, you just needed not to comment and tell
us we were wrong.
>> PS: I will fall off my chair if Beauregard now replies saying, "Sorry
>> I was wrong, Opera is the only browser that doesn't support the
>> length of your div - you were right". We are very happy we have such
>> a big div! It means we don't need to compensate in other areas of
>> life ;)
>
> "Sorry, how was I to know by just a quick scan of Oxford Street that it
> was not complete?" Having never been there, of course. It scrolled and
You weren't. You weren't even asked to consider it let along comment or say
"it works fine" when we know it doesn't.
> Keep your chair.
Keep your hair.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|