|
|
Posted by dorayme on 11/29/07 20:06
In article <eTx3j.54885$c_1.50609@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
"Mika" <anon@anon.com> wrote:
> news:doraymeRidThis-F09CE7.20013629112007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
> > In article <kzu3j.54796$c_1.10991@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
> > "Mika" <anon@anon.com> wrote:
> > There is one thing I would not mind raising with you. What is
> > your actual evidence that in the UK itself (you are welcome to
> > confine it to Londoners if you like) your site is something that
> > people would be pleased with, use and shop, come back to and so
> > on. What is the control on these claims? Ever done any science?
> >
.....
> >
> > If you are having commercial success with your site, good luck to
> > you. But there is more to consider than the micro details.
>
> yes the
> site makes money in the UK, and we get 5-figure hits per month, many from
> repeat visitors.
>
If you are making significant money, why are you bothering with
the criticisms here that are way off all proper understanding in
your estimation? Frankly, I would not mind seeing an objective
analysis of what your UK visitors actually do and think? What
really constitutes repeat visitors (I am a repeat visitor). The U
tube demo is publicity, it does not show the average UK visitor
experience, I could make that here.
Please now publish a full account of your costs and takings, in
detail (*we* can do the dividing by 3). And prepare for a
representative committee from alt.html visiting to look into your
books and commission focus groups and surveys among the UK
residents.
You will be expected to put the committee up in comfortable
circumstances. By the way, in case I am lucky enough to get on to
it, I don't like Earl Grey (too scenty for me), but I do like
Brit winters, arrange some snow, I like snow.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|