|  | Posted by Ben C on 12/02/07 21:59 
On 2007-12-02, Jonathan N. Little <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:> Ben C wrote:
 >
 >> This was suggested the first time around, but OP wants the picture of
 >> the clock and the left, and RENDEZVOUS centered (horizontally and
 >> vertically) in what's left of the dark blue bit.
 >>
 >> Hence the float idea.
 >
 > Yeah, but the float then makes the vertical alignment problematic and
 > viewport|text-size issues.
 
 I agree it makes the vertical alignment more of a bother-- I suggested
 an 80px line-height on the container, which does the trick, but requires
 hard-wiring 80px which happens to be the same height as the clock image.
 
 The viewport|text-size issues were caused by the width: 25% on the
 container (in the OP's original version) and I did suggest a fix for
 that (while keeping it at 25%). The float isn't the problem there per
 se-- the line will break in a narrower viewport if the image is inline
 in just the same way.
 
 Using a background image for the other image as you have done is nice and
 simple, but you haven't preserved the 25%/75% ratio the OP wanted
 between the blue bit and the image.
 
 Did he really want exactly that is it just something he ended up with? I
 don't know. I just try to fix the problem as asked without changing
 anything else. Others here are more qualified to comment on design,
 accessibility, fluidity, etc.
 
 > Not to mention possible IE bugs.
 
 That goes without saying...
 
 > Sometimes a compromise like: does the RENDEZVOUS *absolutely have to be*
 > centered as long as visually there is a bit of padding of blue left and
 > right will do? Especially where it is simpler in markup and less likely
 > to break.
 
 I think so-- it mostly fills the little blue space it's in anyway, so
 centering it is not a dramatic effect. I almost did suggest settling for
 left-alignment there, but thought the OP could make up his mind: he can
 see that the more exact solution is more complex and decide whether he
 wants to live with it.
  Navigation: [Reply to this message] |