|
|
Posted by dorayme on 12/19/07 04:28
In article <slrnfmgfu6.99u.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>,
Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote:
> On 2007-12-18, dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > In article <slrnfmfdbm.kb3.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>,
> > Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote:
> >
> >> >> dorayme has a webpage about containment of descendent floats with some
> >> >> examples but I can't find the url.
> >> >
> >> > It is (in its unfinishedness) at:
> >> >
> >> > http://netweaver.com.au/floatHouse/page1.html
> >>
> >> That's more about float placing. I meant the other one. You had a box
> >> with some floats in it and some parables about parents ignoring their
> >> children.
> >
> > Ah... you mean:
> >
> > http://netweaver.com.au/floatHouseOfAlice/normalHouse.html
>
> Yes that's the one I was thinking of.
>
> > I found it still on the server. Well, that one was just an
> > earlier version of the longer one. You have to read the longer
> > one on a bit to see that it *is* concerned about how to think
> > about parents, floated children and height.
>
> You're right, I had forgotten that. I only remembered the next bit about
> how floats and inlines arrange themselves.
>
> In fact there's some good stuff there about container heights between
> about pages 3 and 5 which might be useful to the OP to look at.
I now need to incorporate some things about these block
formatting contexts of which you (and rf) speak. Interesting
stuff. I am thinking of ditching a lot of stuff about browser
differences, these differences simply take up all of one's time!
I wish the W3C had made their own browser to follow their own
standards. Then everyone would see at a glance how IE and Safari
and FF measure up to the standard.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|