|
|
Posted by Steve on 12/19/07 18:25
"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:_KqdnZ-phoDSWfvanZ2dnUVZ_rCtnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL. You're
> the only one who's claimed that can be done. And you still haven't shown
> how it can be done in PHP. If you have, please show me where.
<quote of jerry's initial response to the op>
Not easy, and it can't be done with PHP. The browser needs to process
the redirect, so you need to do it from the browser end. That means a
client-side language such as javascript.
cURL could theoretically help you here - but you're asking for a lot of
work, especially if there are several pages being handled after the
redirect. You'd have to parse each page to see what to do next.
</quote>
hmmm, you expect the 'it' in "it can't be done with PHP" to mean 'redirect',
yet think that "curl could theoretically help you here" should somehow be
taken in harmony with:
<quote>
Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL.
</quote>
what should we read 'here' to mean, as in "theoretically help you here"? i
mean, you keep bitching about me showing you to be a liar because i quote
you out of context. hell, i just supplied the whole damn post. guess what,
kinda makes you seem like you're...well...lying.
as for the programming shit. why would i suddenly jump out and say, "hey
everyone, i'm a programmer"? there's no reason for me to, and in that case
ONLY, i'd have to prove the claim. as part of your ad-hom campaign, YOU
claimed i was NOT a programmer. YOU have to supply proof. i simply reject
your claim because of lack of proof on your part and first-hand knowlege to
the contrary. whether i say you're wrong because i have proof to the
contrary or not, your claim is simply rejected because you have no supporing
evidence.
again, you only see things with half-logic. yes, someone should provide
proof. that someone is you. anyway, i don't care what you think. and, i'm
obviously having fun showing you to be mentally deficit and
dishonest...having waited a few days to see if you'd dropped the whole
matter. i suppose your recent entanglements with mad-hatter kept you busy
enough. it was soooo sad to see that even a novice like OMH could articulate
better reasoning for a solution (that others conferred was better than
yours) than you could. what was it? oh yeah, to cut down on spam piping
through your servers, you suggest blocking an entire range of ip
addresses...failing to note that spam is a hit-once-move-on, covert
activity. yeah, a static solution to a dynamic problem...THAT hits the spot.
:)
hell, in this thread you already behave like OMH...now you're even letting
him get the better of you in giving the most reasonable and logical
solutions to problems. i wish they had a cure for your alzheimers, the old
jerry was pretty good at this whole php thing.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|