|
|
Posted by Steve on 12/19/07 18:37
"Erwin Moller"
<Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com> wrote in
message news:4769595c$0$85795$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
> ???? ??? ?????? wrote:
>> Excuse me!!
>> Would you stop for a moment?!
>> O...man...Haven't you thought-one day- about yourself ?
>> Who has made it?
>> Have you seen a design which hasn't a designer ?!
>
> Good question, ???? ??? ??????!
> Who made your designer?
> .....
> Well??
well, obviously since nothing complex that we've every experienced has begun
as something more simple, the most reasonable answer would be...something
more complex than the designer. begging the same question ad-nauseum of each
increasingly more complex creator.
lest we forget, gawd is a 'special' case and being omni* does not require
something more complex to create him/her/it/them.
erwin, on the notion of irreducibly complex...has the proponent of that
argument *ever* been able to show something that was? and that's forgiving
the man-made, relative notions of complexity, order, randomness, etc..
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|