|
|
Posted by Steve on 12/20/07 04:53
"asdf" <asdf@asdf.com> wrote in message
news:4769963c$0$20608$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote in message
> news:Hxdaj.193$dh1.173@newsfe05.lga...
>>
>> "Erwin Moller"
>> <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com> wrote in
>> message news:4769595c$0$85795$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
>>> ???? ??? ?????? wrote:
>>>> Excuse me!!
>>>> Would you stop for a moment?!
>>>> O...man...Haven't you thought-one day- about yourself ?
>>>> Who has made it?
>>>> Have you seen a design which hasn't a designer ?!
>>>
>>> Good question, ???? ??? ??????!
>>> Who made your designer?
>>> .....
>>> Well??
>>
>> well, obviously since nothing complex that we've every experienced has
>> begun as something more simple, the most reasonable answer would
>> be...something more complex than the designer. begging the same question
>> ad-nauseum of each increasingly more complex creator.
>>
>> lest we forget, gawd is a 'special' case and being omni* does not require
>> something more complex to create him/her/it/them.
>>
>> erwin, on the notion of irreducibly complex...has the proponent of that
>> argument *ever* been able to show something that was? and that's
>> forgiving the man-made, relative notions of complexity, order,
>> randomness, etc..
>
> I prefer the belief that as higher powers are reached, entropy takes over,
> where things become more and more random and less structured, rather than
> moreso.
at least that would be logical...and what we typical earthlings observe and
experience. however, entropy effects all. i'm pretty sure entropy would, as
you say, have more of an impact on more complex things...more working parts
to go defunt as opposed to a simple form. hmmm.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|