| 
	
 | 
 Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 12/28/07 03:52 
Radio Man wrote: 
> On Dec 28, 12:48 pm, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote: 
>> Radio Man wrote: 
>>> On Dec 28, 1:01 am, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote: 
>>>> Steve wrote: 
>>>>> "Onideus Mad Hatter" <use...@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message 
>>>>> news:tqvcl3t38ndk471vucmckqe69anu2nh0aq@4ax.com... 
>>>>>> On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:25:48 +1030, Michael 
>>>>>> <michae...@pythontech.net.au> wrote: 
>>>>>>> Chilly8 wrote: 
>>>>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote in message 
>>>>>>>> news:0v2dnWmDBPFamsvanZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@comcast.com... 
>>>>>>>>>> It appears that by simply blocking incoming traffic from the networks 
>>>>>>>>>> of three data centers around the world has stopped it. I have only see 
>>>>>>>>>> one "phony" registration all day, coming from China. Blocking all 
>>>>>>>>>> traffic from inHoster in Ukraine, Keymachine in Germany, and 
>>>>>>>>>> FDC servers in Chicago has pretty much stopped the porn bots. 
>>>>>>>>> For now.  But how many legitimate users might you be blocking, also? 
>>>>>>>>> Blocking an entire range of addresses is almost never the right answer. 
>>>>>>>>> Just the expedient one. 
>>>>>>>> I doubt I would be blocking any legitimate users, as those sites I 
>>>>>>>> mentioned 
>>>>>>>> are all server colocation facilities. It appears that somoene has 
>>>>>>>> compromised 
>>>>>>>> all the machines at least two of those server farms. It might be 
>>>>>>>> possible 
>>>>>>>> that 
>>>>>>>> some users, trying to use a proxy from work to acoid detection by the 
>>>>>>>> boss, might be  affected by blocking FDC servers, since a couple of 
>>>>>>>> popular anonymity services use  FDC for their server needs, but 
>>>>>>>> beyond that, I don't think many legitimate users will be affected, but 
>>>>>>>> there really is no other answer to the problem. 
>>>>>>> With your logic, why don't you block the entire internet... you know, 
>>>>>>> seeing a majority of spam comes from the internet and all. 
>>>>>>> Granted this is where your spam is coming from RIGHT NOW, it wont be in 
>>>>>>> a few weeks time. But thats okay, you will just block those IPs as well! 
>>>>>>>  When you have thousands of blocked IP ranges, are you going to 
>>>>>>> periodically check them, to see if they have been re-allocated to some 
>>>>>>> poor ISP? 
>>>>>>> It is your site, but you should really consider other options. 
>>>>>>>  - Michael 
>>>>>> Well, I for one don't really give a fuck.  I mean if he wants to cut 
>>>>>> off his nose to spite his face...let him.  Further if you and he are 
>>>>>> ever applying for a job and the interviewer asks for examples of sites 
>>>>>> you've done that employ spam prevention techniques...guess which one 
>>>>>> of you is gonna get the job? 
>>>>> dude, jerry teaches. that means his job is not dependant on first-hand 
>>>>> knowledge of the pitfalls of making bad decisions. he gets to research and 
>>>>> reherse what he's going to say (theoretically) works. he's probably a good 
>>>>> teacher. as for pragmatism and solutions that require inventiveness, he's 
>>>>> not your guy. i doubt he will ever enter the cut-throught world of 
>>>>> consulting again...outside of teaching. that's despite the fact that he is a 
>>>>> competent developer. 
>>>> ROFLMAO!  Try again, troll.  I do more programming in a week than you do 
>>>> in a year. 
>>> You have been saying that for a while. Have you got an example that we 
>>> can view. 
>>> -- 
>>> Regards Chad.http://freewebdesignonline.org 
>> Well, Stevie has never proven he's a programmer.  He's just a poor, 
>> unwanted person hiding behind an alias and is deathly afraid someone 
>> will find out who he really is. 
>> 
>> And if he were a programmer, he would know better than to post some of 
>> the wild comments he does here.  That right there makes it obvious he 
>> doesn't know any thing about programming. 
> Oh you were talking about that guy. Yeah your probably right about 
> that. 
> I agree that it's pointless to block the IP's though as it's time 
> consumeing. 
> 
 
Definitely.  Not only time consuming, but almost endless.  I say almost  
because right now there are only about 4B ip addresses to block.  Of  
course, that will get worse as soon as IPV6 gets more widely accepted. 
 
>> I've never seen anything correct from him that can't be found on 
>> hundreds of websites, and lots of incorrect junk - like PHP only runs as 
>> a CGI under IIS, you can do post redirects in PHP, and he can steal PHP 
>> sessions.  These are all comments made in the last two to three weeks, 
>> and just the tip of the iceberg. 
>> 
>> That says it all. 
>> 
> -- 
> Regards Chad. http://freewebdesignonline.org 
>  
>  
 
 
--  
================== 
Remove the "x" from my email address 
Jerry Stuckle 
JDS Computer Training Corp. 
jstucklex@attglobal.net 
==================
 
  
Navigation:
[Reply to this message] 
 |