|
|
Posted by Andy Dingley on 07/30/05 02:29
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:09:56 +0100, Toby Inkster
<usenet200507@tobyinkster.co.uk> wrote:
>"if Macromedia were, in the next version, going to remove the
>visual editor or the code editor from the product, which would go?"
Obviously the code editor would go.
- Dreamweaver is sold to those who think that visual design interfaces
are the way to work.
- Dreamweaver is a poor code edtor in comparison to the other, far
chaper, products.
As the ultimate purpose of Dreamweaver is to sell Dreamweaver, not to
build sites, then the makers would obviously have to play to their
perceived strengths, not their actual performance.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|