|
|
Posted by Steve on 12/31/07 02:12
"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:toudnehNdoqSIe7anZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>> news:_KqdnZ-phoDSWfvanZ2dnUVZ_rCtnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL. You're
>>> the only one who's claimed that can be done. And you still haven't
>>> shown how it can be done in PHP. If you have, please show me where.
>>
>> <quote of jerry's initial response to the op>
>>
>> Not easy, and it can't be done with PHP. The browser needs to process
>> the redirect, so you need to do it from the browser end. That means a
>> client-side language such as javascript.
>>
>> cURL could theoretically help you here - but you're asking for a lot of
>> work, especially if there are several pages being handled after the
>> redirect. You'd have to parse each page to see what to do next.
>>
>> </quote>
>>
>> hmmm, you expect the 'it' in "it can't be done with PHP" to mean
>> 'redirect', yet think that "curl could theoretically help you here"
>> should somehow be taken in harmony with:
>>
>> <quote>
>>
>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL.
>>
>> </quote>
>>
>> what should we read 'here' to mean, as in "theoretically help you here"?
>> i mean, you keep bitching about me showing you to be a liar because i
>> quote you out of context. hell, i just supplied the whole damn post.
>> guess what, kinda makes you seem like you're...well...lying.
>>
>
> You really don't know how to read, do you, Stevie. I said it couldn't be
> done in PHP. And that is correct. Period.
>
> Then I went on to say that cURL could help him. But I didn't say cURL
> could do the redirect.
you said it could 'theoretically' be done using curl.
> You're the only one who has claimed PHP can do redirects.
nope, i said he could use just php and html to get the desired results. you
need help with *your* reading.
>> as for the programming shit. why would i suddenly jump out and say, "hey
>> everyone, i'm a programmer"? there's no reason for me to, and in that
>> case ONLY, i'd have to prove the claim. as part of your ad-hom campaign,
>> YOU claimed i was NOT a programmer. YOU have to supply proof. i simply
>> reject your claim because of lack of proof on your part and first-hand
>> knowlege to the contrary. whether i say you're wrong because i have proof
>> to the contrary or not, your claim is simply rejected because you have no
>> supporing evidence.
>>
>
> You're desperately looking for acceptance from someone, some where.
really? lol.
> And nope, you're the one who claimed you are a programmer. Prove it.
> But you can't, loser.
idiot. you said i was not a programmer. it's up to *you* to prove it. i and
my employers know otherwise.
> I'm just rejecting your claim that you're a programmer.
lol. yours was the initial posit. my rejection of your claim was not a claim
in itself...just rejection...which i know you get a lot of.
<snip>
sorry, did you say something?
> ROFLMAO! You wouldn't know logic if it bit you in the ass.
funny, that's where you keep yours stored. :)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|