| 
	
 | 
 Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 12/31/07 13:34 
Steve wrote: 
> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message  
> news:V9idndyZVKOozOXanZ2dnUVZ_qPinZ2d@comcast.com... 
>> Steve wrote: 
>>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message  
>>> news:mJidnRYAhdsKJO7anZ2dnUVZ_sbinZ2d@comcast.com... 
>>>> Steve wrote: 
>>>>> "Michael Fesser" <netizen@gmx.de> wrote in message  
>>>>> news:0hlim3hgb5p7ifm2o13pjm6q4l0q5jhiim@4ax.com... 
>>>>>> .oO(Logos) 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Dec 13, 3:16 pm, Michael Fesser <neti...@gmx.de> wrote: 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> At least when working with objects. But nevertheless 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> $foo = new Test(); 
>>>>>>>> $a = $foo; 
>>>>>>>> $b = &$foo; 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> are still different things, even in PHP 5. In some particular  
>>>>>>>> situations 
>>>>>>>> this might become an issue. 
>>>>>>> Oooo...errr...ummm...could someone explain how exactly those are 
>>>>>>> different when using PHP5, then, please?  If everything is done by 
>>>>>>> reference for objects, then to me $a and $b both look like pointers  
>>>>>>> to 
>>>>>>> an object. 
>>>>>> Don't confuse pointers with references, they are entirely different 
>>>>>> things. PHP doesn't know pointers. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> And correctly spoken objects in PHP 5 are _not_ passed by reference  
>>>>>> (at 
>>>>>> least it's not what PHP calls a reference), even if it's still  
>>>>>> mentioned 
>>>>>> that way on many websites. But it's wrong. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Internally objects are represented by a handle (a simple number),  
>>>>>> which 
>>>>>> is what is moved around when you assign objects to variables, copy  
>>>>>> them 
>>>>>> or pass them to a function. You're never working directly with the 
>>>>>> object itself, but with its handle. Of course usually you won't notice 
>>>>>> that, because it's handled transparently by PHP. 
>>>>> michael, for people who come from a c/c++ background, what you've  
>>>>> described is *exactly* a pointer. the only difference in php is that  
>>>>> rather than the handle pointing to a memory address where information  
>>>>> is stored, this php handle points to a symbol table entry where  
>>>>> information is stored. 
>>>>> 
>>>> Wrong again, Stevie.  A C++ pointer is not the same as a C++ reference.  
>>>> And C doesn't have references, just as PHP doesn't have pointers. 
>>>> 
>>>>> in php, a reference (or byref) behaves *IDENTICALLY* to a c/c++  
>>>>> pointer. there are somethings that you cannot do with this reference in  
>>>>> php that you could in other languages, however, the nature of the beast  
>>>>> is the same. i know that a reference in php is really just an alias of  
>>>>> the symbol table entry, but really that just seems a matter of  
>>>>> symantics to me. i don't care where things are stored at such a low  
>>>>> level when i'm writing in a scripting language. i care about behaviors. 
>>>>> 
>>>> Wrong again.  They behave much differently. 
>>> read, jerry, read. show me how in *PHP* the behavior is different. you've  
>>> tried before and failed. i'm not talking about the differences in  
>>> c/c++/c# (as they *are* different there)...we're talking about php. 
>> Stoopid.  Show me where PHP has pointers.  It doesn't. 
>> 
>> And you're the one who claimed that references and pointers behave  
>> identically in C/C++.  Wrong again. 
>  
> nope...i just said they were different in c, c++, and c#. i said for *PHP*  
> the behavior is essentially the same. i never said php had pointers...but  
> that the behavioral description is similar to pointers...and gave the  
> caveats about the actual terms and definitions so that is was clear that  
> there is technical difference. 
>  
> learn to read.  
>  
>  
>  
 
"i said for *PHP* the behavior is essentially the same." 
 
"i never said php had pointers" 
 
You're so dense you can't even see the contradiction on your own statements. 
 
You're just a stoopid troll, Stevie, who uses people in a desperate  
attempt to get some kind of acceptance.  You don't use your real name  
here because you're so afraid people will find out you're not really a  
programmer. 
 
But you're stoopidity has given you away once again.  Any programmer  
with more than two weeks of *real experience* in C++ programming knows  
the difference between pointers and references - and knows how wrong you  
are. 
 
You're the worst kind of loser. 
 
--  
================== 
Remove the "x" from my email address 
Jerry Stuckle 
JDS Computer Training Corp. 
jstucklex@attglobal.net 
==================
 
  
Navigation:
[Reply to this message] 
 |