|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 01/03/08 04:53
Steve wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:VuydnRBwdfYti-HanZ2dnUVZ_vOlnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
>> PHP doesn't have pointers. Period. End of statement. You cant describe
>> references in relationship to something which doesn't exist.
>
> sure you can. for the newbie, 'pointer' means nothing. they have no
> knowledge of pointers as defined by another language. that is WHY i use the
> term to describe references in php...because people 'get' it.
>
Sure - YOU CAN. But intelligent people know better.
> and for taking you literally...bollocks. it's called inference. try and use
> it sometime, as it is the key to intelligence.
>
You wouldn't know inference if it bit you in the ass.
>>> illiterate twit.
>>>
>> Projecting again, huh, Stevie?
>
> no, stucco.
>
ROFLMAO! I haven't heard that one since third grade. But that's about
your intelligence level.
>>>> You've just once again opened your "mouth" and removed all doubt about
>>>> your stoopidity.
>>> a cliche you just mangled...and have no idea who originated it - outside
>>> of google.
>>>
>> No mangling. Just paraphrasing to match the circumstances. But I'm
>> sorry - I used a word which was too big for you.
>
> and by 'stoopid', you're trying to emulate another troll...OMH? or, is that
> just more confirmation of your illiteracy?
>
Nope. Just trying to phrase things in words you can understand.
>> And if you must know, it was Mark Twain - one of the many familiar sayings
>> he coined.
>
> lol...googling again?
>
Nope. Unlike you, I didn't need to google it.
>>>>>> You're just a stoopid troll, Stevie, who uses people in a desperate
>>>>>> attempt to get some kind of acceptance. You don't use your real name
>>>>>> here because you're so afraid people will find out you're not really a
>>>>>> programmer.
>>>>> is that right.
>>>>>
>>>> Yep. You give yourself away virtually every time you respond to a post
>>>> here.
>>> you're funny.
>>>
>> Thank you.
>
> no, no...not a compliment.
>
From you, it is.
>>>>>> But you're stoopidity has given you away once again. Any programmer
>>>>>> with more than two weeks of *real experience* in C++ programming knows
>>>>>> the difference between pointers and references - and knows how wrong
>>>>>> you are.
>>>>> php != c++ ... your point is moot.
>>>>>
>>>> Then why did you bring it up? Backpedaling again, stoopid troll?
>>> i didn't. micha did initially. secondarily, you did. my first mention was
>>> the *caveat* that the *behavioral* description was not literally correct
>>> with c-style languages.
>>>
>> You're the one who tried to compare PHP references to something which
>> doesn't exist.
>
> rof! pointers DO exist. if pointers DID exist in *PHP*, i'd have used a
> different descriptive for references in *PHP*. but, i've already addressed
> that...and your statement here is simply stupid as you leave out the context
> for the claim 'doesn't exist'.
>
No, PHP pointers do not exist. And that's what you tried to compare
reference to you.
And if you're taking about C/C++ pointers, it shows how little you
understand those pointers. Not at all the same.
But only programmers understand that, so it's no wonder you get them
mixed up.
>>>>>> You're the worst kind of loser.
>>>>> is that anything like a dipshit who keeps posting the same drivel day
>>>>> after day just to have someone to chat with? sounds more like you jerry
>>>>> than me.
>>>> Just the truth, Stevie. But you can't handle it. You could always stop
>>>> responding. But I know you won't.
>>> again, jerry, for me to be effected emotionally by your insults, i'd have
>>> to care about your opinion. i don't. you can stop trolling now...it has
>>> no effect.
>>>
>> Quite frankly, I don't give a damn if your AFFECTED or not. But you do
>> need to get a dictionary.
>
> then why bother hurling them, lame-ass.
>
Then why do you bother responding, STOOPID TROLL. Because it does
affect you! ROFLMAO!
If it didn't affect you, you'd just ignore them and not respond. Your
responses are proof that you're lying - AGAIN.
>>> further, you still respond because *you're* a troll.
>>>
>> ROFLMAO!
>>
>>>> Now I hear your mommy calling. Better go see what she wants.
>>> lol. she did call. having christmas together with the rest of the fam.
>>> are you trying to say you've found out my age. i think your only safe
>>> assumption there is that i am younger than you. that's a *safe*
>>> assumption simply for the fact that i know your *exact* age...and MOST
>>> EVERYONE here is younger than you. :)
>>>
>>> cheers, pops.
>> No, there are several here who are older than I am. But it's not hard to
>> find out how old I am. I don't try to hide behind an alias.
>
> good for you. your point?
>
>
>
Nothing. YOU brought it up, STOOPID!
But there isn't anyone here YOUNGER than you - at least in intellectual
maturity.
Not to mention your lack of programming knowledge.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|