|
Posted by Doug Baiter on 01/04/08 21:39
On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:35:23 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
<jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>Andy Jacobs wrote:
>> On 3/1/08 5:32 pm, in article woSdnZsPvMPzgeDanZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@comcast.com,
>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>> You did not start this discussion with usability issues. You started it
>>> with SPAM. Plain and simple. And now you SPAM more.
>>>
>>> You aren't going to find anyone to discuss SPAM with you.
>>>
>>> And with that attitude, you won't find anyone to discuss ANYTHING with
>>> you - unless it's another spammer.
>>
>> I don't get it. Why was the original post spam? Are you saying that there
>> are no jobs available and that the 'quoted' text is the prime reason for the
>> post?
>>
>> Let's say I post the following:
>>
>> Freelance designers wanted with experience of
>>
>> * CSS
>> * xhtml
>> * Photoshop
>> * php/MySQL
>>
>> Redcat Media are a leading edge web design and development agency based in
>> Hampshire in nice offices with free parking and we're also very good at
>> search engine optimisation.
>>
>> Is that spam? By putting such a blatant plug for my company as an example,
>> is that double spam?
>>
>
>Because ads are not wanted on a.w.w. It's in the FAQ's. That's what
>a.w.w.a is for.
Ooops, wrong again. Wow, Jerry, do you EVER get one right?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|