|  | Posted by Doug Baiter on 01/04/08 21:39 
On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:35:23 -0500, Jerry Stuckle<jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
 
 >Andy Jacobs wrote:
 >> On 3/1/08 5:32 pm, in article woSdnZsPvMPzgeDanZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@comcast.com,
 >> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
 >>
 >>> You did not start this discussion with usability issues. You started it
 >>> with SPAM.  Plain and simple.  And now you SPAM more.
 >>>
 >>> You aren't going to find anyone to discuss SPAM with you.
 >>>
 >>> And with that attitude, you won't find anyone to discuss ANYTHING with
 >>> you - unless it's another spammer.
 >>
 >> I don't get it.  Why was the original post spam?  Are you saying that there
 >> are no jobs available and that the 'quoted' text is the prime reason for the
 >> post?
 >>
 >> Let's say I post the following:
 >>
 >> Freelance designers wanted with experience of
 >>
 >> * CSS
 >> * xhtml
 >> * Photoshop
 >> * php/MySQL
 >>
 >> Redcat Media are a leading edge web design and development agency based in
 >> Hampshire in nice offices with free parking and we're also very good at
 >> search engine optimisation.
 >>
 >> Is that spam?  By putting such a blatant plug for my company as an example,
 >> is that double spam?
 >>
 >
 >Because ads are not wanted on a.w.w.  It's in the FAQ's.  That's what
 >a.w.w.a is for.
 
 Ooops, wrong again. Wow, Jerry, do you EVER get one right?
  Navigation: [Reply to this message] |