|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 01/06/08 18:24
Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:36:18 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:00:21 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:14:24 GMT, Doug Baiter <doug-baiter@no.where>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:26:11 -0500, Gary L. Burnore
>>>>>>>> <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:47:33 GMT, Doug Baiter <doug-baiter@no.where>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:49:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In <XrqdnW_lGbgurODanZ2dnUVZ_u_inZ2d@comcast.com> on Thu, 03 Jan
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 14:03:11 -0500, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In <C3A2D429.F13D%nospam@redcatgroup.co.uk> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18:04:25 +0000, Andy Jacobs <nospam@redcatgroup.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't get it. Why was the original post spam?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't. It was many things, including being a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pathetically-badly disguised festering heap of marketing shite,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it wasn't spam.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those insisting it was spam are merely flaunting their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluelessness. A post is *only* defined as being spam when it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breaches the Breidbart Index. Nobody has provided any evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that that particular bit of midge's effluence has exceeded the BI.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Breidbart Index is woefully out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>>> When was that decided? I must have missed that debate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's been dismissed as virtually meaningless for quite a while, now.
>>>>>>>>>>> SPAM has changed, but the index hasn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In a.w.w, ads of any kind are considered SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>>>> What aww might or might not consider is about as relevant outside
>>>>>>>>>>>> aww as a spider's fart. I'm not reading this thread in aww.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fine. I am reading this in a.w.w., and it is spam here.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The BI was adopted as a way of avoiding would-be Usenet vigilantes
>>>>>>>>>>>> deciding to classify posts as spam on the basis that they disliked
>>>>>>>>>>>> the contents. This discussion shows that the wisdom of that
>>>>>>>>>>>> concern still has relevance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So you have some meaningless, out of date measurement which doesn't say
>>>>>>>>>>> something is spam or not, but only classifies the severity of the SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Right. Try again.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Until someone else comes up with a better content-blind objective
>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of spam, the BI is still the benchmark.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There is. The charter and/or FAQs for the newsgroup. And the FAQs for
>>>>>>>>>>> a.w.w., which were agreed to by the majority of the regulars here,
>>>>>>>>>>> classify this as spam.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> LIA[SLAP]
>>>>>>>>> FAQs aren't charters and are not enforceable. Charters in unmoderated
>>>>>>>>> alt gorups are also uninforceable. Off charter in comp groups, on the
>>>>>>>>> other hand, is something that can get your news provider's attention.
>>>>>>>> My bad - didn't look first at the group list. While perfectly
>>>>>>>> acceptable in AWW, in a comp group you're right in that its off
>>>>>>>> charter which *is* enforcable. Perhaps the zealots in AWW should
>>>>>>>> attempt to have it reclassified into a group that has an official
>>>>>>>> charter, but in the meantime nobody cares :o)
>>>>>>> There's really no such thing as a valid charter in an alt.* group.
>>>>>>> Alt.config is a bogus group of morons who want to turn alt into
>>>>>>> another form of big8 groups. Never gonna happen. Of course,
>>>>>>> moderated groups can and do control content but non-moderated groups
>>>>>>> are freeform. Stukkie will just have to learn to use a killfile
>>>>>>> there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nevertheless, please accept my apologies for the mistake.
>>>>>>> Accepted. Unfortunately, Jerry won't stop crossposting back to
>>>>>>> comp.*.
>>>>>> Sorry, Gary.
>>>>> Liar.
>>>>>
>>>> Let's see you prove that statement, Gary.
>>> You're doing it for me, Jerry. YOU are still posting to comp.lang.php
>>> and he's not "making you do it". YOU are the one posting off charter.
>>> YOU. Not him.
>>>
>> And your posts are on topic? ROFLMAO! Pot-Kettle-Black.
>>
> How's that ignoring me thing going, stukkie? OOPS, did you LIE again?
>
ROFLMAO! Keep it up, troll!
>>>> you're just as bad as the troll is.
>>>>>> I have been attacked and maligned by two trolls in a.w.w
>>>>>> who have cross-posted to c.l.p. and other newsgroups. I will not let
>>>>>> those go away.
>>>>> Because you're owned. Owned owned owned.
>>>>>
>>>> Ok, let's tell your employer you're a criminal and a fraud. See if you
>>>> like it?
>>> Go for it, dipshit. I've been called far worse. My employer is
>>> DataBasix.com. OOPS! Too bad for you.
>>>
>> Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running? ROFLMAO!
>
> Hahahahaha. DataBasix isn't a WEBSITE, dumbass.
>
Nope, but you can't keep a website up. ROFLMAO!
>>>> But you're obviously a troll - familiar over a bunch of newsgroups and
>>>> message boards on the usenet. A quick search brings up several
>>>> complaints about your trolling.
>>> Poor little tard. You should surely soon be quoting that Jerry
>>> Terranson website and stepping right into kookdom. Once you find it,
>>> you'll see why I feel safe in saying that people who make up false
>>> shit about you don't matter. YOU're the one who's making a fool of
>>> yourself.
>>>
>> A lot more than just one website, troll.
>
> Bring it on, stuckkie. You know you want to.
>
Not at all. I don't have to. Too many others have exposed you for the
troll you are.
>>>> So from now on I'll just ignore you - like the ignorant should be.
>>>>
>>>>>> However, it may not be a problem from at least one of these for much longer.
>>>>> If he loses an account because you lied to his NSP, I'll see to it he
>>>>> gets a free account. Since you've decided to go play NetKKKop, I'll
>>>>> take every one of your off charter posts to your provider, comcast. K?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> No lies. Just showing the ISP's what they've done.
>>> Liar.
>>>
>> Sorry, troll. No lies.
>
> Liar.
>
>
Projecting again, Troll?
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|