|
|
Posted by Jeff on 01/06/08 19:25
dorayme wrote:
> In article <13o0md6nph0dla2@corp.supernews.com>,
> Jeff <jeff@spam_me_not.com> wrote:
>
>> Fister wrote:
>>> Hello dorayme,
>>>
>>>> I could have sworn there was something that might be a good fix for
>>>> this in a post a few minutes ago!
>>>>
>>>> http://examples.tobyinkster.co.uk/3col-new
>>> Thanks, that would be a solution. But isn't it possible without the use
>>> of JavaScript?
>>>
>>>
>> I have problems with that page in IE6 windows, it locks up the
>> browser. I didn't look at the javascript but this can't be difficult. I
>> think the basic idea is sound and should work with other two plus column
>> layouts.
>>
>> Not since the ill fated NS4 used javascript to implement CSS (and not
>> well) has the use of javascript been in the toolbox for styling needs.
>> And the cool thing (with the obvious exception of Toby's 3 column in
>> IE) is that it degrades nicely.
>>
>> Jeff
>
> Well, OK, I always leave it till very late to look at Win IE. But
> by now, perhaps there is a fix for TI's page.
My initial WAG was that the javascript was in a loop. Probably because
of the onresize event handler. TI is pretty sharp about these things I
suspect it won't be much trouble for him to fix it. Neither is it much
trouble to write your own resize code. I thought of this a couple weeks
ago after seeing all the javascript rounded corners examples, if js is
not a bad option there (it degrades well), then why not for the problem
of having same sized columns? That's one thing table layouts do well
that CSS just can't do without a little logic.
Bootnic suggested
> something. TI will look at it and we will see. God! I feel like a
> cricket commentator!
>
> [The test between Australia and India is on. (7/184) and 8 overs
> to go and India will not win, the question is will Australia?]
I've heard that the rules of cricket are very simple.
Jeff
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|