| 
	
 | 
 Posted by Steve on 01/07/08 14:19 
"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message  
news:jO2dnY2_t8l5jh_anZ2dnUVZ_qPinZ2d@comcast.com... 
> Steve wrote: 
>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message  
>> news:5pCdnYoQjrhRAhzanZ2dnUVZ_tHinZ2d@comcast.com... 
>>> Steve wrote: 
>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message  
>>>> news:7pCdnciBY-RFc-PanZ2dnUVZ_sTinZ2d@comcast.com... 
>>>>> Steve wrote: 
>>>>>> <PASTED FROM ALT.PHP> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message  
>>>>>> news:6KmdnRk59_ChqOPanZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d@comcast.com... 
>>>>>>> adam.timberlake@gmail.com wrote: 
>>>>>>>> I was reading the following article yesterday: 
>>>>>>>> http://www.talkphp.com/vbarticles.php?do=article&articleid=41&title=using-the-internal-array-pointers-to-access-elements-in-arrays 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> What struck me while reading it was how very little we hear about  
>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>> array internal pointers !! I've been in PHP now for a good 2 years, 
>>>>>>>> and I've never heard these little guys mentioned before. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> My question is... what do you use internal pointers for, and why? 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I use them a fair amount.  Sometimes you need to run through an  
>>>>>>> array, 
>>>>>>> and foreach() just doesn't do what you need (or makes the code more 
>>>>>>> complicated). 
>>>>>> lol. you get on to the op for multiposting and tell him you've  
>>>>>> answered his question here. this is an answer?! your only good point  
>>>>>> was not multiposting. however, i'm sure no one in comp.lang.php will  
>>>>>> miss this 'answer'...as it does nothing for anyone. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> why not tell the op *how* you use them and give an example of *how*  
>>>>>> your use does something that foreach doesn't (or doesn't easily) do?  
>>>>>> hell, i'd be very interested in THAT myself. i can't think of a  
>>>>>> situation that would apply. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> a better answer is that most languages have these constructs.  
>>>>>> typically in more formal languages there is an iterator interface  
>>>>>> whereby you can can impliment into a strongly typed collection object  
>>>>>> that will contain only those types of items. your implimenting  
>>>>>> object/collection keeps track of the 'pointer' spoken about in the  
>>>>>> article and exposes those standard pointer functions. implementing  
>>>>>> said interface allows the language to iterate, i.e. foreach, the  
>>>>>> items even though you may have heavily customized your collection. i  
>>>>>> would assume that having said little known pointer functions would  
>>>>>> allow forward compatibility should php start to become more strongly  
>>>>>> data typed in future versions. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> AND OAN, funny how the writer of the article uses the word internal  
>>>>>> 'pointer'. count how many times. i couldn't be laughing harder. 
>>>>> So now you've gone from a troll to a stalker!  I think you're hung up  
>>>>> on me, Stevie! 
>>>>> 
>>>>> And BTW - he asked a question - I answered it.  He didn't ask HOW to  
>>>>> use them.  Just IF anyone used them. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Learn to read, STALKER! 
>>>> yes, please do! 
>>>> 
>>>> (notice the key words) 
>>>> 
>>>> "My question is... *what* do you use internal pointers for, and *why*?" 
>>>> 
>>>> the question was NOT *does* anyone use them...which is the question you  
>>>> made up to answer. you didn't address any of his questions. read more  
>>>> carefully, jerry-berry. 
>>> ROFLMAO, stalker.  And your attempts at third grade insults again show  
>>> your maturity level.  We already know your intellect - or actually, the  
>>> lack there of. 
>> 
>> yet, your ad-hom's do nothing for your demonstrated lack of literacy.  
>> quote your answer and show exactly where it is that you covered 'what'  
>> and 'why'. 
>> 
>> <crickets chirping> 
> 
> No ad hominems, stalker.  Just the truth. 
 
true or false doesn't an ad-hom make. you're trying to divert attention to  
the fact that you said i can't read, yet demonstrate that you clearly  
did/can not. 'what' and 'why', jer. 
 
<crickets *still* chirping>
 
  
Navigation:
[Reply to this message] 
 |