|
|
Posted by Steve on 01/07/08 21:34
"Gary L. Burnore" <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote in message
news:flu08m$h8o$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:27:44 -0600, "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>>news:ILydnUJwJLbq6R_anZ2dnUVZ_umlnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> And the Stalker Steve wrote:
>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:05ydnfgyXun41hzanZ2dnUVZ_tXinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>> LOL, jerry. seems you make friends at every possible turn!
>>>>
>>>> good to see you're trolling someone else these days.
>>>>
>>>> btw, i'm still waiting on you to:
>>>>
>>>> 1) find out who i am - as you claim can so easily be done.
>>>
>>> As I've said before. You're not worth the effort. But you can't stand
>>> that, can you, troll!
>>
>>as i've said before, you *can't*. but you know you couldn't whenever you
>>said it.
>
> Same argument he gives about his website! "I have a website, honest!
> You just can't see it!"
>
>
>>
>>>> 2) give me a url of *yours* that implements your 'security' - which you
>>>> claim is hack-proof.
>>>
>>> Don't need to. You said you could hack a PHP session. Let's see you do
>>> it! Pick any reasonable site. How about SourceForge? They use PHP and
>>> sessions. Let's see you hack it and get access to my session there.
>>
>>oh no, your challenge was "hack any of my [stucco] sites". first, you
>>don't
>>even have a site. second, i told you that hacking another site whilst
>>uninvited carries serious legal implications. your's was an
>>invitation...so,
>>again, give me one of *your* sites...just as you originally challenged me
>>to
>>hack.
>>
>>>> 3) demonstrate that you are not a pathetic old man.
>>>>
>>>
>>> ROFLMAO!
>>
>>with or without dentures in? never mind, i've seen your mug. it's equally
>>hilarious mental imagery either way. :)
>>
>>>> you keep a troll'n ol' boi...keep a troll'n.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just keep stalking, Stevie. You're another one I OWN.
>>>
>>> Now speak, boy, speak!
>
> Stealing from me again, poodle?
>
>>first you copy OMH-isms for trolling. now you use gary's. rof!
>>
>>you own shit...and to quote gary properly:
>>
>>good poodle...good poodle.
>>
>>come up with some of your own material, numbnutz.
>>
> I think you misspelled nullnutz. hth.
i think nullified nutz is akin to being a eunuch. funny how it still applies
either way. :)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|