|
|
Posted by dorayme on 06/21/11 12:00
In article
<timstreater-25B98E.21162316012008@news.individual.net>,
Tim Streater <timstreater@waitrose.com> wrote:
> In article
> <doraymeRidThis-4B82D2.06462017012008@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
> dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
> > In article
> > <2662527f-4d74-4b08-9076-5081daff9208@v46g2000hsv.googlegroups.co
> > m>,
> > Travis Newbury <TravisNewbury@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 16, 6:39 am, XyZed <a...@washerhelp.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > Back in the day I was convinced by a core of purists to design a fluid
> > > > site that worked on all formats and used only css for styling.
> > >
> > > It wasn't true back then, and it isn't true today. There is NO
> > > BLANKET RULES for how a website should be built or the technologies
> > > you should use to build it. If anyone tells you different they are
> > > just being pigheaded or ignorant.
> > >
> > O well, here goes: always use a title, always put a doctype,don't
> > make the font-size so small that only very few people can read
> > it, ...
>
> These are reasonable rules. It's when they say "never use tables or
> frames or iframes" that it becomes unreasonable.
Ah you mean to defend our Travis, Mr Motherhood, to the very end!
All reasonable rules but not unreasonable ones. <g>
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|