|
|
Posted by Jeff on 01/20/08 04:52
Andrew H wrote:
> On Jan 18, 4:04 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> In article
>> <fb55ca53-4764-4c87-a42f-4ee73b626...@l1g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
>>
>> "AGw. (Usenet)" <freder...@southernskies.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 18, 2:51 pm, Andrew H <ahods...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Friendly advice, to heed before someone says something rude to you:
>>> The standard on this newsgroup, and on most other "technical" groups,
>>> is to bottom post, not to top post.
>> {and lots of good further advice from AGw... snipped here]
>>
>> Here is a suggestion for a look:
>>
>> <http://netweaver.com.au/alt/andrewHodson.html>
I looked at this first in IE6 windows and noticed that image dropped
below the content border (the bottom border intersects the bottom
quarter of the image).
In Firefox 2.0 the box expanded to include the image.
I notice that the box is set for overflow: hidden, which struck me as
a bit odd.
Just another bit for your box model collection.
Jeff
>>
>> --
>> dorayme
>
> I like the design you came up with dorayme, and AGw that discussion of
> CSS was helpful. I feel more confident that I am on the right track
> now and I thank you all for that. BTW am I bottom posting at this
> point? I am using google groups and I think I am posting correctly,
> but if not let me know.
>
> For that design, if I wanted to use that as say a theme and then
> create a number of pages with that template, would that require me to
> use that CSS style page, as opposed to the inline style?
>
> I have been using dreamweaver, but only to edit the html text (I find
> it is helpful to see the results of each change) and things seem to be
> going well.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|