|
|
Posted by rf on 01/21/08 05:07
"Dave Kelly" <daveekelly1@embarqmail.com> wrote in message
news:723a6141-232d-496e-9f46-daf8fcbdf07d@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> To get back to topic. I ask my question and ya'll answered. For that
> I thank everyone. I was down to 2 errors and kept fiddling with it.
> Now I have to go back and clean up my mess.
You might look into optimising your images. You have over 900 KB of images
on the index page alone.
Particularly I see one (a picture of a trout) that is 158K. It's a 400x300
image resized in the browser to 120x90. Resize the images before you upload
them, don't resize them in the browser. Apart from the fact that it does a
terrible job compared to your image processing software, it means I am
downloading that huge 158K image instead of, probably, an 8K thumbnail.
--
Richard.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|