|
|
Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 01/22/08 19:42
adwatson wrote:
> That seems like a pretty clean solution to something that always
> seemed to require way more "hacking" around in css than it should. In
> the past I've just given up and used a table for it, rather than screw
> around with some of the over-complicated css versions I've seen
> floating around.
>
Your prerogative, however with "your way" if you decide you longer like
2, 3, 4 columns and wish to have only one, it requires entirely redoing
the page. With CSS, you only need to change the stylesheet if don
properly. (Also that means you users can do the same if they choose) And
it also means you can have it in columns for display and one column for
printing with the same page. Cannot do that with tables...
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|