|
|
Posted by mrcakey on 01/23/08 16:54
George W Bush wrote in message
news:167d388f-d79b-4246-8320-0ef400b7588a@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> Not to start another war, but....
>
;-)
.......
I think we all might be wasting a lot of keypresses and bandwidth on this
issue. Perhaps people have different agenda and we should just agree to
disagree.
My own two cents:
Letting the user's browser control so much of the layout is a nice goal -
user's font, user's screen size, maximum accessibility etc., but while it's
appropriate for some sites, people get paid an absolute fortune to work on
the aesthetics of a company's branding (aesthetics being distinct from
design). These people know what they're doing - there are combinations of
white space and visual elements that work and combinations that don't. It's
wrong to castigate these people for wanting a site laid out the way they
specify. The only way to ensure this is to use a rigid layout. If I have a
three column layout with divs floated left and right and the content in the
middle is relatively sparse, it's going to look absolutely abysmal in a
browser stretched out to 1400px plus isn't it?
+mrcakey
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|