|  | Posted by Neredbojias on 01/25/08 15:29 
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:38:22GMT dorayme scribed:
 
 > In article <Xns9A2FD0B593351nanopandaneredbojias@85.214.90.236>,
 >  Neredbojias <monstersquasher@yahoo.com> wrote:
 >
 >> Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Thu, 24 Jan 2008
 >> 20:37:34 GMT dorayme scribed:
 >>
 >> > In article <Xns9A2F87C91AB5Cnanopandaneredbojias@85.214.90.236>,
 >> >  Neredbojias <monstersquasher@yahoo.com> wrote:
 >> >
 >> >> Seriously, however, I'm not particularly attracted to a
 >> >> well-engineered vehicle with an uninspired design and neither are
 >> >> most consumers.
 >> >
 >> > What would an example of such a vehicle be?
 >>
 >> Hard to say.  Perhaps an Edsel?  (-or XY...)
 >>
 >> People will mention cars like the VW Beetle or Range Rover, but
 >> they're not them.  Those were adequately engineered and
 >> pleasingly-designed in their day and became "classics" over the
 >> years.  Also, "pleasingly-designed" does not have to mean things like
 >> graceful curves or symmetry, either.
 >
 > So what quite is the purpose of your post?
 
 To state there are 2 major qualities to a web page - design and engineering
 - and it takes both to make a good one.
 
 --
 Neredbojias
 Riches are their own reward.
  Navigation: [Reply to this message] |