|
|
Posted by Animesh K on 01/29/08 19:48
Steve wrote:
> "Animesh K" <animesh1978@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fnlvv0$cj6$4@agate.berkeley.edu...
>> Steve wrote:
>>
>>> all hits indicate are the 'path most travelled'. as more than half the
>>> internet users can't tell their ass from a hat, i think taking the
>>> 'lowest views/responses' would be a clear indication that i'm on the
>>> *right* path.
>>>
>>> :)
>> By that logic, you must be visiting sites which are least popular. bye bye
>> Nytimes, google, microsoft.com, yahoo, amazon, youtube, digg, facebook,
>> etc.
>
> uhm, the new york times is never worth reading, google, yahoo, and digg are
> not end-point but entry points - matches are by relevance. microsoft is by
> relevance, youtube is by download not by visit, and i've no idea what
> facebook is...so, it must not be too important.
>
> now of any of those, where does an ordinary counter mechanism fall into the
> picture?
>
>
You were telling that 'path least travelled' was the right path. I gave
a few examples of path most travelled, but you seem to visit them.
Microsoft becomes relevant to you, google becomes an entry point ---
just to prove that your wrong argument is right.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|