|
Posted by Steve on 01/29/08 20:34
"Animesh K" <animesh1978@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fno272$11ee$1@agate.berkeley.edu...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Animesh K" <animesh1978@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> christ almighty! 'relevancy' has to do with the *materials* ms has that
>> is most *appropriate* to what i'm searching for. not only is this
>> personalize and very specific to me and my keywords/phrases, the results
>> can be *ranked* as to whether or not the result(s) were *relevant* and to
>> what extent. NONE of that machinery has ANY counter mechanism to it...AT
>> ALL.
>>
>
> Well someone asked why are counters useful?
>
> I told they can tell you commonly sought articles/videos/ or commonly
> tread paths.
>
> You told you want to take the unpopular path in an effort to argue that it
> will be the right path.
>
> WTH has counter to do with the above statement of yours? You wanted to
> take unpopular paths, which excludes the most popular websites -- which
> you do use. Writing an essay or two will not make your past argument
> correct.
yet if you read *any* of the 'essay' (or understood english), you'd not
restate your stupidity.
counters *don't* help you find meaningful content (daft meter registered)
counters *don't* indicate popularity (daft meter elevated)
popularity *doesn't* help you find meaningful content (daft meter elevated)
NONE of your examples use counters. (daft meter too high to register)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|