|
|
Posted by rf on 01/30/08 22:30
"dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:doraymeRidThis-9C4F1B.08520931012008@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
> In article <60c7kjF1prbblU1@mid.individual.net>,
> Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Besides that, I'm curious why people who are so sure that it isn't worth
>> building a more flexible design now don't see why it's even less worth
>> building a design that will require a complete overhaul when the
>> resolutions are even higher a few years from now. I'm thinking about the
>> people who built fixed designs that worked at 800 x 600 several years
>> ago and now have a presentation that can't be read on screens with twice
>> the pixels in each dimension (text too small
>
> I wish some operating system makers thought more flexibly on this
> one too.
They did.
Windows, at least, allows one to specify the size of menus and other such
things.
--
Richard.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|