|
|
Posted by Chris F.A. Johnson on 01/30/08 23:04
On 2008-01-30, dorayme wrote:
> In article <60c7kjF1prbblU1@mid.individual.net>,
> Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Besides that, I'm curious why people who are so sure that it isn't worth
>> building a more flexible design now don't see why it's even less worth
>> building a design that will require a complete overhaul when the
>> resolutions are even higher a few years from now. I'm thinking about the
>> people who built fixed designs that worked at 800 x 600 several years
>> ago and now have a presentation that can't be read on screens with twice
>> the pixels in each dimension (text too small
>
> I wish some operating system makers thought more flexibly on this
> one too. When I moved from CRT to LCD and got higher res, great
> for pics, the menu fonts got peskily smaller.
I have never seen one that didn't have that flexibility.
--
Chris F.A. Johnson, webmaster <http://Woodbine-Gerrard.com>
===================================================================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|