|
|
Posted by Jochem Maas on 08/03/05 01:34
Meno Abels wrote:
> it is only a typo in my email i use __construct
ok - I would recommend cut-n-paste for this kind of output
to prevent idiots like me pointing out you typos and to avoid confusion
in general.
the next questions would be:
a, how many parents does the problem class (Link or Links?) have?
b, is Rank the base class?
c, does Rank::__construct() actually exist?
d, does the error also occur with php5.0.x? (as apposed to php5.1beta)
given these questions may seem silly - but I can't see your code from
here :-) so I figured I'd ask anyway!
>
> Meno
>
> 2005/8/2, Jochem Maas <jochem@iamjochem.com>:
>
>>Pawel Bernat wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:42:00PM +0100, Meno Abels wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hello,
>>>>
>>>>With my application that uses heavily inherent classes, sometimes I
>>
>>deeeeep class heirarchies can lead to brainfreeze - beware of going to deep :-)
>>
>>
>>>>get the following message:
>>>>PHP Fatal error: Call to undefined method Rank::_construtor() in
>>>>.../inc/Links.class.php. It works with php
>>>>4.x when I use the old style of constructor calling
>>>>$this->(CLASSNAME) . But when working with php 5.2 b2 or b3 in the old
>>>>OR the new style, I get the PHP Fatal error from above.
>>>>Is there any hints to look at this problem?
>>>
>>>Why do you call _construct instead of __construct? And how do you do it?
>>
>>he seems to be calling _construtor() which although not wrong is not the
>>method he is looking for (cue voice of Alex Guiness for the second time this week :-)
>>
>>try __construct()
>>
>>PS - this kind of thing belongs on generals until you are _sure_ it's an
>>internals problem. IMHO.
>>
>>
>>>Did you read everything at http://php.net/construct (including Note)?
>>>What about php 5.0?
>>>
>>
>>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|