|
|
Posted by Jochem Maas on 08/03/05 11:22
Meno Abels wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> the problem with cut an paste i have not only one of these messages
> i get huge amounts of these. So i stripped down to one, sorry my fault.
>
> a) usally 4-6
any given class will never have a variable number of parents ;-)
IMHO 6 levels deep is pushing the boat out a bit - but technically it
should be no problem
> b) no
> c) yes, as I mentioned i tried both (old/new)
again it may sound stupid but double check spelling in the file.
also check for weird non-printing chars in the problem file -
> d) never tested i jump over 5.0
5.1 is still beta - test it on 5.0 (consider that the mailing list equivelant
of a military order ;-)
does the problem occur in only 1 baseclass? or in a fixed number of
baseclasses? or is does it occur anywhere/everywhere.
are you trying to reassign $this or are you using the reference token (&)
when passing objects around? (I ask because you seem to indicate that the
codebase is being moved from php4 where such things are almost required to
make usuable OO code - whereas in php5 it's asking for trouble)
pump up error_reporting to full i.e. error_reporting( E_ALL | E_STRICT )
- maybe it will give you a hint.
also you might consider placing a call to debug_print_backtrace() in each
and every constructor to help see wtf is going on.
lastly get a copy of Zend Studio Client/Server and set it up so that you
can do step by step debugging to see _exactly_ what is going on.
I'm running out of ideas here ... I can only suggest now to post code
- and plenty of it - if that is possible, send a link to somewhere rather than
bombard everyone on the list with 1000's of lines of code.
>
> the problem with the code is currently the problem only occures in the
> real application which as about 20000 lines of code. I tried to
> stripped down
> but there was not success. So I ask about how could i work out an idea
> from the php source to find these problem. I'am pretty sure that i done
> everything rightly in my application code. It works perfectly with the
> old-style and php 4.x
> and i converted all to the new style which is easy of course it is
> generated
> php source code so there is not really a general fault possible. If the
> generator works-:)
that last IF is a big one though!
>
> your questions aren't silly
I know that ;-) I was just trying to make sure you didn't feel as if I was
talking down to you :-)
>
> meno
>
> Am 02.08.2005 um 23:34 schrieb Jochem Maas:
>
>> Meno Abels wrote:
>>
>>> it is only a typo in my email i use __construct
>>>
>>
>> ok - I would recommend cut-n-paste for this kind of output
>> to prevent idiots like me pointing out you typos and to avoid confusion
>> in general.
>>
>> the next questions would be:
>>
>> a, how many parents does the problem class (Link or Links?) have?
>> b, is Rank the base class?
>> c, does Rank::__construct() actually exist?
>> d, does the error also occur with php5.0.x? (as apposed to php5.1beta)
>>
>> given these questions may seem silly - but I can't see your code from
>> here :-) so I figured I'd ask anyway!
>>
>>
>>> Meno
>>> 2005/8/2, Jochem Maas <jochem@iamjochem.com>:
>>>
>>>> Pawel Bernat wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:42:00PM +0100, Meno Abels wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With my application that uses heavily inherent classes, sometimes I
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> deeeeep class heirarchies can lead to brainfreeze - beware of going
>>>> to deep :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> get the following message:
>>>>>> PHP Fatal error: Call to undefined method Rank::_construtor() in
>>>>>> .../inc/Links.class.php. It works with php
>>>>>> 4.x when I use the old style of constructor calling
>>>>>> $this->(CLASSNAME) . But when working with php 5.2 b2 or b3 in
>>>>>> the old
>>>>>> OR the new style, I get the PHP Fatal error from above.
>>>>>> Is there any hints to look at this problem?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do you call _construct instead of __construct? And how do you
>>>>> do it?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> he seems to be calling _construtor() which although not wrong is
>>>> not the
>>>> method he is looking for (cue voice of Alex Guiness for the second
>>>> time this week :-)
>>>>
>>>> try __construct()
>>>>
>>>> PS - this kind of thing belongs on generals until you are _sure_
>>>> it's an
>>>> internals problem. IMHO.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Did you read everything at http://php.net/construct (including Note)?
>>>>> What about php 5.0?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|