|
|
Posted by Jochem Maas on 08/05/05 23:21
Eric Gorr wrote:
> Jochem Maas wrote:
>
>> Eric Gorr wrote:
>>
>>> Jochem Maas wrote:
>>> > http://php.net/manual/en/function.stream-wrapper-register.php is as
>>>
>>>> close as it gets
>>>> I think. - total overkill for manipulating strings IMHO - (me thinks
>>>> there is atleast
>>>> one other in agreement) - there is a reason php has all those built
>>>> in string functions :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And there are good reasons why other very intelligent people thought
>>> that including such functionality directly in the C++ STL and many
>>> other libraries was a good idea too.
>>
>>
>>
>> indeed - but php !== c++ obviously.
>>
>> personally I don't get your angle on this one, but like Jay I'd be
>> interested to know how you think this might be useful - so if you
>> could give an explicit (as poss.) example it might help us to
>> understand.
>
>
> Well, as I mentioned before, you are welcome to look into the
> surrounding useful examples for istringstream, etc. I can't think of a
> single reason why similar reasons why istringstream, etc. is useful
> would not apply to a php stream_wrapper for strings.
I know google - the c++ stuff is a little (my first understatement of the day :-)
over my head - couldn't find anything that made things clearer for me.
>
> As for why things like istringstream, etc. are useful, you can also head
> over comp.lang.c++ and ask...I, quite simply, have no interest in a
> debate or discussion I already know the final answer to....i.e. it is
thanks for the heads up.
> useful.
some people would say the same about guns - I don't get that either.
>
>> btw do you think the functionality surrounding stream_wrapper_register()
>> will do it for you?
>
>
> I don't see any reason why not at the moment.
thats good I guess :-)
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|