|
|
Posted by FrankB on 10/24/55 11:23
Dr. Flonkenstein was thinking very hard :
> On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 23:59:39 +0000, FrankB wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter brought next idea :
>>> On 6 Aug 2005 10:03:42 GMT, "FrankB" <you.can@request.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Let them all send a screeshot then.
>>>
>>> Why don't you go ask them? Of course, chances are they don't really
>>> care about your inane fuckin stupidity, in which case they'll probably
>>> just blow you off...and they should.
>>
>> One did, here :
>> Message ID : <1in3sz8gzzuz.1b0lasdlh88$.dlg@40tude.net>
>> in AAVFFF froup.
>>
>>>> But, i believe you, no doubt. You're not a fraud, you're a joke.
>>>> I mean, Matt, you did not intend to ..write that gem of a blog with the
>>>> purpose of really meaning it ??? Yes ? Admit you were joking with that
>>>> fluffy page, come on..
>>>
>>> "fluffy page"...is that a Meow reference?
>>
>> Answer my question, pleaso do, are you a prat in between DaDa artistry
>> that makes pranks on subdirectories of his/her/it own useless site ?
>> (we're waiting for your "Portfolio", Matt)
>>
>>>> I decent "Web-programmer", whatever that stands for, should at least
>>>> use a browser dedection juvahhscript ... on client side (LOL!).
>>>> Free clue : use SSI mod_perl to do these.
>>>
>>> Jesus, teh poor boi is just rambling incoherently now. Oh and uh, it
>>> does have browser detection,
>>
>> It is prolly that ..ahum.. detection snipped that messes all up..
>> When variables on client-side are not assigned.. off course it "IS YOUR
>> DAMN PUTER's/HARDWARE FAULT", lol, here, go and get some consolation :
>> http://www.thenetworkadministrator.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>> So knowing that i have IFRAMES disabled
>>>> -- why should i allow those to
>>>> load pages i didn't requested with x-www-applications that i don't care
>>>> about to install and run it.
>>>
>>> If you requested the main site you requested any sub sections
>>> associated with it, ie you don't get the banana without also getting
>>> the banana peel.
>>
>> LOL! Can i archive this ?
>>
>>> And as for plugins, OMG WTF are they really THAT
>>> scary?
>>
>> No, it is a boring job to deal with..
>>
>>
>>>> A WWW browser has the solely purpose of getting (GET) TEXT information
>>>> about my next flight from A to B, have RSS->rendered TEXT feed about
>>>> the latest news in my preffered language or purchase a book at lowest
>>>> rate.. hmm ?
>>>
>>> ...then what are you bitching about? I mean, why did you even GO to
>>> my site in the first place, you fuckin MORON.
>>
>> I like my daily comics, Mattie.
>>
>>> OMG HOW
>>> FUCKING RETARDED ARE YOU?
>>
>> Day -3
>>
>>>>> Oh, BTW, side note to Spanky, it might work now on teh Mac...although
>>>>> I had to sacrifice W3C compliancy in order to do it.
>>>> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.backwater-productions.net
>>>>
>>>> And about a year ago you said "I don't care about W3's compliancy"..
>>>> Matt, you may be an artist but please, don't be a buffoon and avoid
>>>> Cn0tm awards.
>>>
>>> Franky, you may be a dumbfuck but please, don't be a drooler and avoid
>>> reality.
>>
>> :) Next! :
>
> What makes your think a scriptboi like Diaperqueen is able to understand
> how networks work, he's strangled in his own.
... poultry ?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|