|
|
Posted by smallfoot on 10/04/72 11:23
In article <mn.39037d58ca3d0cec.32168@request.net>, you.can@request.net
says...
> Dr. Flonkenstein expressed precisely :
> > On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 01:37:17 +0000, FrankB wrote:
> >
> >> Dr. Flonkenstein scripsit in
> >> <pan.2005.08.07.01.24.37.797193@localhost.localdomain> :
> >>> On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 01:19:15 +0000, FrankB wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Dr. Flonkenstein was thinking very hard :
> >>>>> On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 23:59:39 +0000, FrankB wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter brought next idea :
> >>>>>>> On 6 Aug 2005 10:03:42 GMT, "FrankB" <you.can@request.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Let them all send a screeshot then.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Why don't you go ask them? Of course, chances are they don't really
> >>>>>>> care about your inane fuckin stupidity, in which case they'll probably
> >>>>>>> just blow you off...and they should.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> One did, here :
> >>>>>> Message ID : <1in3sz8gzzuz.1b0lasdlh88$.dlg@40tude.net>
> >>>>>> in AAVFFF froup.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> But, i believe you, no doubt. You're not a fraud, you're a joke.
> >>>>>>>> I mean, Matt, you did not intend to ..write that gem of a blog with
> >>>>>>>> the purpose of really meaning it ??? Yes ? Admit you were joking with
> >>>>>>>> that fluffy page, come on..
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "fluffy page"...is that a Meow reference?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Answer my question, pleaso do, are you a prat in between DaDa artistry
> >>>>>> that makes pranks on subdirectories of his/her/it own useless site ?
> >>>>>> (we're waiting for your "Portfolio", Matt)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I decent "Web-programmer", whatever that stands for, should at least
> >>>>>>>> use a browser dedection juvahhscript ... on client side (LOL!).
> >>>>>>>> Free clue : use SSI mod_perl to do these.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jesus, teh poor boi is just rambling incoherently now. Oh and uh, it
> >>>>>>> does have browser detection,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It is prolly that ..ahum.. detection snipped that messes all up..
> >>>>>> When variables on client-side are not assigned.. off course it "IS YOUR
> >>>>>> DAMN PUTER's/HARDWARE FAULT", lol, here, go and get some consolation :
> >>>>>> http://www.thenetworkadministrator.com/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So knowing that i have IFRAMES disabled
> >>>>>>>> -- why should i allow those to
> >>>>>>>> load pages i didn't requested with x-www-applications that i don't
> >>>>>>>> care about to install and run it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If you requested the main site you requested any sub sections
> >>>>>>> associated with it, ie you don't get the banana without also getting
> >>>>>>> the banana peel.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> LOL! Can i archive this ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And as for plugins, OMG WTF are they really THAT
> >>>>>>> scary?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No, it is a boring job to deal with..
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> A WWW browser has the solely purpose of getting (GET) TEXT information
> >>>>>>>> about my next flight from A to B, have RSS->rendered TEXT feed about
> >>>>>>>> the latest news in my preffered language or purchase a book at lowest
> >>>>>>>> rate.. hmm ?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ...then what are you bitching about? I mean, why did you even GO to
> >>>>>>> my site in the first place, you fuckin MORON.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I like my daily comics, Mattie.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> OMG HOW
> >>>>>>> FUCKING RETARDED ARE YOU?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Day -3
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Oh, BTW, side note to Spanky, it might work now on teh Mac...although
> >>>>>>>>> I had to sacrifice W3C compliancy in order to do it.
> >>>>>>>> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.backwater-productions.net
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And about a year ago you said "I don't care about W3's compliancy"..
> >>>>>>>> Matt, you may be an artist but please, don't be a buffoon and avoid
> >>>>>>>> Cn0tm awards.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Franky, you may be a dumbfuck but please, don't be a drooler and avoid
> >>>>>>> reality.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> :) Next! :
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What makes your think a scriptboi like Diaperqueen is able to understand
> >>>>> how networks work, he's strangled in his own.
> >>>>
> >>>> .. poultry ?
> >>>
> >>> I knew chicken were involved, but not how!
> >>
> >> koOky on Mattie's side, web-commerce on the other side :
> >> http://www.tefal.com/tefal/
> >> And note : "I *claim* to use CMS" (dixit Mattie Moulton ;-))
> >
> > Do you really think backwaters.net was involved in this project?
>
> Nah! Sheesh.. Mattie could not even afford a banner space on that one,
> maybe for the color-blind customers and people browsing with tilting
> monitors,
> who knows ?
>
> Maaaatt, email, here, now, quick ! An offer ! Take it !
Baby Matthew isn't interested in much that doesn't involve diapers or
baby toys.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|