|
Posted by RW+/- on 08/15/05 05:07
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:04:12 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 01:21:11 GMT, RW+/- <eat@joes.hut> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 02:03:45 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 09:14:58 +0200, "Barbara de Zoete"
>>> <b_de_zoete@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 6 Aug 2005 20:53:14 -0700, Gary L. Burnore <garylburnore@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>It would be nice if the subject is just the subject and not an attempt to
>>>>replace the message body. Some lines of text do no harm.
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.backwater-productions.net
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You got to be joking. It's bad. It's not a design, it's a ... I don't know. It's
>>>>something people do as a first try of building websites when they are about
>>>>eleven years old. Something like that. Nothing more.
>>>
>>> D00d, that's like one of my oldest sites and it completely beats the
>>> living fuck out of ANYTHING you've got. I mean, seriously, have you
>>> LOOKED at yer .sig lately?
>>>
>>> Your blog...
>>> http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/_private/weblog.html
>>>
>>> My blog...
>>> http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog/
>>>
>>> *snicker*
>>>
>>
>>*snicker*?
>>
>>Heh, yours only partially loaded, hers? saw teh full thing.
>>
>>No complaints from yer end, no warnings, just a small blue block, one comic
>>book character pix and not much else except a small icon that's obviously
>>there because something refused to load in IE6+
>
> What's not loading for you on the blog site? Does your dumbass have
> Flash installed? Woah, Flash is teh HARD, yo!
>
Ayup, flash is installed, but nothing on your site bothered to check. I
didn't bother to turn it on to find out if that was the culprit. I figger
that the dumbass that programmed it would have bothered to check if they
wanted users to log on/read.
I have it blocked, cuts down on bullshit ads.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|