|
|
Posted by RW+/- on 08/15/05 07:10
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:50:46 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 03:27:32 GMT, RW+/- <eat@joes.hut> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:13:11 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 02:47:02 GMT, RW+/- <eat@joes.hut> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Cause if you are you're either using some completely off the wall
>>>>> browser that nobody has ever heard of or you're lying. Teh Flash
>>>>> portions only make up the drop downs, everything else works perfect
>>>>> and has been tested by numerous people on Netscape, Firefox and IE and
>>>>> on various OS's including Windows, Linux and teh Mac OS.
>>>
>>>><rolls eyes>
>>>
>>> Rolling your eyes doesn't change the fact that it's been tested on
>>> various browser and operating systems and has been shown to work
>>> perfectly, Stupid.
>>>
>>
>>LOL, its your problem not mine.
>
> ...how is your dumbass not being able to see one of my sites a problem
> for me? Hells bells, Stupid, you could walk the fuck out in front a
> train tomorrow and I wouldn't give a shit one way or another. Maybe
> if you actually produced or were somebody noteworthy I might care if
> you could access my site or not...but yer just some nobody who fucked
> up yer browsers settings. It's not like I'm gonna come on over to
> your house and sort your stupidity out for you.
>
Sorry cupcake, works fine everywhere else.
>
>>>>Heh, see my comments on some other flash thread.
>
>>> ...why would I go looking for any more of your inane fuckwitted
>>> stupidity? Don't you think you've given me plenty enough already?
>
>>Sure I did, face it, you fucked up and now you're on overload.
>>If other sites work and youra don't? Well....... ;)
>
> *test teh blog again*
>
WTF fer? I doubt you fixed it.
> It's workin perfect, Retardo, not sure what the hell you're tryin to
> project but I wouldn't quit your day job.
>
Oh shit, the lame day job routine, surely you can do better than that.
Oh *wait*, take that back, I saw your blog....well actually not. *shrug*
>>>>No my fault if you didn't cover all the bases. *shrugs* pat, pat.
>
>>> You're right, I don't bother to take retards into consideration...or
>>> blind people either for that matter...or people using Lynx who wish
>>> they were blind.
>
>>Hehe, still doesn't excuse the lame ass programmer who failed to do a
>>simple task.
>
> Of creating a text only fall back for losers like you who fucked up
> their web browser? I'm sorry, but I simply don't cater to stupidity,
> no matter how simple it would be to humor you.
>
No fuckhead, Just a little check on your part that would apprise the user
of the situation. Of course taht requires coding skills. :)
If you had I might have cliked the button that would have turned on flash,
but heh, no biggee, I didn't think it important enough to do it or I'd of
tried it in the first place.
You can fix it or no, no skin off my back cupcake.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|