|
|
Posted by dave hillstrom on 09/27/38 11:24
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:46:09 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
<usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:38:04 -0400, smallfoot <tippy@toe.left> wrote:
>
>>In article <2or9g1heuj0vujs32ev3qlf15s5u8ivagu@4ax.com>,
>>usenet@backwaterxxxxxxxxx.xxx says...
>>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:19:40 -0400, smallfoot <tippy@toe.left> wrote:
>>>
>>> >In article <c4r9g1d441511klvomkk320q4o24brtm14@4ax.com>,
>>> >usenet@backwater-productions.net says...
>>> >> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:06:54 -0400, smallfoot <tippy@toe.left> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >In article <8jo9g15n20kh1ol9n7bdbbc48709ia5crh@4ax.com>,
>>> >> >usenet@backwater-productions.net says...
>>> >> >> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:38:24 +0100, Mimic <dev@null> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>>Like you need a survey to figure that out... ;)
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Not when he's pulling figures out of his ass anyway. *sigh* I wish
>>> >> >> >> the lurkers supported ME in email, I REALLY do...*snicker*...
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> *Hatter hums to himself*
>>> >> >> >> http://www.backwaterxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> ^_^
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> >Looking better, you know what would make that look nice.. extend the
>>> >> >> >width to 100%, so you get a "widescreen" effect.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> An interesting idea, I'll test it out, see if I like it. Did you try
>>> >> >> moving your mouse on the frog?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> >_____________________
>>> >> >> >|////////////////////|
>>> >> >> >| |
>>> >> >> >| |
>>> >> >> >|////////////////////|
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >type effect, also maybe onload the mouseover images at the body.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Actually I'm seriously considering doing the whole thing in Flash. I
>>> >> >> keep trying to think of reasons not to, but every time I start
>>> >> >> exploring them I just keep running back to where I started.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Flash Downsides
>>> >> >> ==========
>>> >> >> Some people may not have Flash downloaded...but then if they don't
>>> >> >> it's set to redirect them to the Flash download page...
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Some people may have disabled Flash...but the number of people who
>>> >> >> have Flash disabled (probably around .001%) is even less than the
>>> >> >> number of people who have JavaScript disabled (probably around .01%).
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I figure, if no one in these froups can formulate a halfway coherent
>>> >> >> reason that I can't counter for not using Flash...I'm just gonna go
>>> >> >> ahead and do the whole thing like that.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >It doesn't matter what you use, in the long run, since nobody is going
>>> >> >to see it after you quit spamming Usenet with the URL.
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm<SLAP>
>>> >
>>> >Opinion rejected.
>>>
>>> What's<SLAP>
>>
>>Query rejected.
>
>Snip and run fan boi, it suits your cowardice. ^_^
next thing you know, hell be post editing.
--
dave hillstrom
this space under construction. donations accepted.
the belgians are thieves.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|