|
|
Posted by smallfoot on 11/12/66 11:24
In article <de2u4a$kcq$11@oliveloaf.databasix.com>, DaVe@MeOw.OrG
says...
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:15:16 +0100, Mimic <dev@null> wrote:
>
> >Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> >> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:38:24 +0100, Mimic <dev@null> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>Like you need a survey to figure that out... ;)
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Not when he's pulling figures out of his ass anyway. *sigh* I wish
> >>>>the lurkers supported ME in email, I REALLY do...*snicker*...
> >>>>
> >>>>*Hatter hums to himself*
> >>>>http://www.backwaterxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>
> >>>>^_^
> >>
> >>
> >>>Looking better, you know what would make that look nice.. extend the
> >>>width to 100%, so you get a "widescreen" effect.
> >>
> >>
> >> An interesting idea, I'll test it out, see if I like it. Did you try
> >> moving your mouse on the frog?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Didnt the first time, but thats really cool :D
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Searching for Hatter and blog puts mine right up at number one and ALL
> >> the content is graphic. This is because search engines don't
> >> generally care about the actual content on your site so much as how
> >> many people are linking to you. If you click on the "cached" option
> >> in Google you can see this:
> >> "These terms only appear in links pointing to this page: hatter blog"
> >>
> >> So really, if your sites are bad ass enough, you don't need to do
> >> anything to get them "search engine optimized" or what the fuck ever
> >> scams faux web designers (like a lot of the ones around here) fall
> >> into.
> >>
> >> I figure, if no one in these froups can formulate a halfway coherent
> >> reason that I can't counter for not using Flash...I'm just gonna go
> >> ahead and do the whole thing like that.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Onideus Mad Hatter
> >
> >
> >Theres alot to SEO, and it is worth getting into. Generally its
> >considered bad SEO to do everything, particularly key aspects, in flash
> >only, same goes for images. But, google for one, have been experimenting
> >and progressing, with the indexing the textual parts of flash and images.
> >
> >The reason your site comes top would be much more to do with usenet
> >posts being cross fed into web boards, which then get google crawled. I
> >did an experiment once, something todo with doom3 [i forget]. I knew
> >there would be alot of traffic and discussion on boards for it as it was
> >just released, so I made a number of posts on the top usenet doom3
> >froups with my link in, and sure enough, these fed the webboards, which
> >now had higher traffic and higher result positions, which then increased
> >the PR of my site and lifted that up. Increased my traffic by about 400% :D
> >
> >The main SEO point where people fall down, is the whole keywords. If you
> >over pack the meta keywords or just stack keywords into the whitespace
> >of your sites [- google is big on content relevance, and thus keywords
> >in content], you can actually get banned from engines. - Again I
> >experimented with this, got off google in like 2 days :P The best thing
> >to do is use semantically correlated keywords - words that mean the same
> >thing, so you dont repeat, and used appropriately of course.
> >
> >What you could do, with the whole widescreen idea, is horizontally
> >repeat the background at 100% width, then center your content and layer
> >it over the top :)
> >
> >These may also be of use if youre going for the whole flash thing:
> >http://tinyurl.com/7pmmu
>
> mimic, werent you being mean and nasty just a day or two ago?
Why are you slurping the Diaper Boy's ass? Don't get me wrong, I'm sure
he appreciates the attention as well as the nice clean tushy; it's just
that it's rare to come across anyone who actually chooses lick the
diaper residue off his big ol' butt.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|