|
|
Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 10/19/79 11:24
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:14:18 -0400, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:19:40 -0400, smallfoot <tippy@toe.left> wrote:
>
>>In article <c4r9g1d441511klvomkk320q4o24brtm14@4ax.com>,
>>usenet@backwater-productions.net says...
>>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:06:54 -0400, smallfoot <tippy@toe.left> wrote:
>>>
>>> >In article <8jo9g15n20kh1ol9n7bdbbc48709ia5crh@4ax.com>,
>>> >usenet@backwater-productions.net says...
>>> >> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:38:24 +0100, Mimic <dev@null> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >>>Like you need a survey to figure that out... ;)
>>> >>
>>> >> >> Not when he's pulling figures out of his ass anyway. *sigh* I wish
>>> >> >> the lurkers supported ME in email, I REALLY do...*snicker*...
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> *Hatter hums to himself*
>>> >> >> http://www.backwaterxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> ^_^
>>> >>
>>> >> >Looking better, you know what would make that look nice.. extend the
>>> >> >width to 100%, so you get a "widescreen" effect.
>>> >>
>>> >> An interesting idea, I'll test it out, see if I like it. Did you try
>>> >> moving your mouse on the frog?
>>> >>
>>> >> >_____________________
>>> >> >|////////////////////|
>>> >> >| |
>>> >> >| |
>>> >> >|////////////////////|
>>> >> >
>>> >> >type effect, also maybe onload the mouseover images at the body.
>>> >>
>>> >> Actually I'm seriously considering doing the whole thing in Flash. I
>>> >> keep trying to think of reasons not to, but every time I start
>>> >> exploring them I just keep running back to where I started.
>>> >>
>>> >> Flash Downsides
>>> >> ==========
>>> >> Some people may not have Flash downloaded...but then if they don't
>>> >> it's set to redirect them to the Flash download page...
>>> >>
>>> >> Some people may have disabled Flash...but the number of people who
>>> >> have Flash disabled (probably around .001%) is even less than the
>>> >> number of people who have JavaScript disabled (probably around .01%).
>>> >>
>>> >> People using text only browsers won't be able to see the content...but
>>> >> then they couldn't see it anyway because I use all pictures and I
>>> >> don't really care about people who pretend to be blind. I mean, BW is
>>> >> a production company, blind people aren't exactly our target
>>> >> audience...hence the reason why movie trailer sites are more often
>>> >> than not all Flash based.
>>> >>
>>> >> I figure, if no one in these froups can formulate a halfway coherent
>>> >> reason that I can't counter for not using Flash...I'm just gonna go
>>> >> ahead and do the whole thing like that.
>>> >
>>> >It doesn't matter what you use, in the long run, since nobody is going
>>> >to see it after you quit spamming Usenet with the URL.
>>>
>>> I'm<SLAP>
>>
>>Opinion rejected.
>
>that technique has always struck me as childish. its like peeing around
>your desk at work to "assert your dominance over your territory"
Or shitting oneself in abject defiance, hoping the smell will drive
away any would be attackers.
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|