|
|
Posted by Vampi Fangs on 11/10/76 11:24
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:48:03 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
<usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:38:24 +0100, Mimic <dev@null> wrote:
>
>>>>Like you need a survey to figure that out... ;)
>
>>> Not when he's pulling figures out of his ass anyway. *sigh* I wish
>>> the lurkers supported ME in email, I REALLY do...*snicker*...
>>>
>>> *Hatter hums to himself*
>>> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/bw3/
>>>
>>> ^_^
>
>>Looking better, you know what would make that look nice.. extend the
>>width to 100%, so you get a "widescreen" effect.
>
>An interesting idea, I'll test it out, see if I like it. Did you try
>moving your mouse on the frog?
>
>>_____________________
>>|////////////////////|
>>| |
>>| |
>>|////////////////////|
>>
>>type effect, also maybe onload the mouseover images at the body.
>
>Actually I'm seriously considering doing the whole thing in Flash. I
>keep trying to think of reasons not to, but every time I start
>exploring them I just keep running back to where I started.
well, well, well
>Flash Downsides
>==========
>Some people may not have Flash downloaded...but then if they don't
>it's set to redirect them to the Flash download page...
>
>Some people may have disabled Flash...but the number of people who
>have Flash disabled (probably around .001%) is even less than the
>number of people who have JavaScript disabled (probably around .01%).
>
>People using text only browsers won't be able to see the content...but
>then they couldn't see it anyway because I use all pictures and I
>don't really care about people who pretend to be blind. I mean, BW is
>a production company, blind people aren't exactly our target
>audience...hence the reason why movie trailer sites are more often
>than not all Flash based.
>
>Search engines supposedly won't pick them up...but then that's
>bullshit. Check this out:
>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Hatter+blog
these search results are the ones you should care about as far as your
'business' goes
http://www.google.com.au/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial_s&hl=en&q=web+design+walla+walla&meta=&btnG=Google+Search
http://www.google.com.au/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial_s&hl=en&q=web+development+walla+walla&meta=&btnG=Google+Search
>
>o_O
>
>Searching for Hatter and blog puts mine right up at number one and ALL
>the content is graphic. This is because search engines don't
>generally care about the actual content on your site so much as how
>many people are linking to you. If you click on the "cached" option
>in Google you can see this:
>"These terms only appear in links pointing to this page: hatter blog"
you might like to read google's tips for web masters
http://www.google.com.au/webmasters/guidelines.html
>So really, if your sites are bad ass enough, you don't need to do
>anything to get them "search engine optimized" or what the fuck ever
>scams faux web designers (like a lot of the ones around here) fall
>into.
>
>I figure, if no one in these froups can formulate a halfway coherent
>reason that I can't counter for not using Flash...I'm just gonna go
>ahead and do the whole thing like that.
--
V--V
"If we don't stop the Reds in South Vietnam, tomorrow they will be in
Hawaii, and next week they will be in San Francisco."
President Lyndon B. Johnson, 1966
"Our military is confronting terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan and in other
places so our people will not have to confront terrorist violence in New
York or St. Louis or Los Angeles."
President George W. Bush, 8/26/2003
http://www.issues2000.org/askme/LBJ_GWB.htm
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|