|
|
Posted by Michael Vilain on 11/15/79 11:24
In article <430538ad@news.victoria.tc.ca>,
yf110@vtn1.victoria.tc.ca (Malcolm Dew-Jones) wrote:
> Michael Vilain (vilain@spamcop.net) wrote:
> : In article <4knft2-q0u.ln1@pluto.downsfam.net>,
> : Kenneth Downs <knode.wants.this@see.sigblock> wrote:
>
> : > Peter Chant wrote:
> : >
> : > >
> : > >> I just meant that, if you're concerned about the security of HTTP
> : > >> authentication (and you have good reasons to), using HTTPS is a very
> : > >> good
> : > >> idea.
> : > >
> : > > I think we are talking slightly at cross purposes. Yes I am concerned
> : > > about http authentication.
> : > >
> : > > My question is, if using HTTPS is the authentication encrypted?
> : > >
> : > > Pete
> : > >
> : > >
> : > >
> : >
> : > yes.
>
> : OK, why does Internet Explorer 6 complain that "Some of the parts of
> : this page aren't secure and some are" when I present a form on a page.
> : I tried explaining this to someone but they decided to mail in the
> : printed PDF with a check instead.
>
> Your page refers to something that is accessed but not via https: such as
> an image, e.g. src="http://my.server.com/images/whatever.gif". The image
> is a non-secure part of the page.
>
> --
>
> This space not for rent.
Great. Thanks. I'll fix that and things should be OK then.
--
DeeDee, don't press that button! DeeDee! NO! Dee...
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|