|
|
Posted by Solbarth on 08/23/05 04:43
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 05:08:11 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter escaped from the
straight jacket long enough to type:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 21:29:25 -0400, FrozenNorth
> <frozennorth123@canada.com> wrote:
>
>>> Why on earth you would be using that as opposed to say FireFox is
>>> beyond me though, teh KHTML engine isn't nearly as good as Gecko.
>
>>Good enough for Apple, Safari uses it.
>
> ...not quite. Safari uses WebCore, which contains PARTS of KHTML. So
> apparently it wasn't good enough for Apple. *shrugs*
>
>>> Oh, I'm sorry, am I confusing you with terms you've never heard of?
>>> LOL, someone could mention Trident and your dumbass would probably say
>>> something like, "No thanks, I don't like gum."
>
>>Quit confusing the issue, you laid a challenge, I told you the judging
>>rules.
>
> Fine then, BITCH:
> http://www.backwater-productions.net/
>
>>>>you have been warned, no flash plugin,
>
>>> ROTFL...well that is the problem when kids like you who don't know what
>>> they're doing install Linux. It's too bad Macromedia only distributes
>>> Flash in binary form for Linux, a fuckin retard like you who SHOULDN'T
>>> EVEN BE USING LINUX couldn't figure out how to compile a binary if yer
>>> life depended on it.
>
>>I've compiled plenty of programs, what is your point?
>
> That you're full of shit.
>
>>>>javascript disabled,
>
>>> Why would you disable JavaScript, Stupid? I mean the Flash thing I
>>> get, yer too damn stupid to know how to compile a binary, but why
>>> JavaScript?
>
>>Just the rules, I set them, you didn't specify anything.
>
> I specify that you stop being so gawd awfully fuckin DUMB...of course,
> that's probably askin a lil too much. Hells bells yer dumbass doesn't
> even what the fuck layout engine Safari is using.
>
>>>>you still want to go for it.
>
>>> ...what would be the point? Not only wouldn't my sites but none of the
>>> other regs sites would work either...not correctly anyway.
>
>>Bet they will be a hell of a lot closer than yours are, most of theirs
>>will function.
>
> Actually I'd be willing to bet that my site is the most cross
> browser/cross system compliant site of ANY regs in this froup...or any of
> the other froups I've been posting to regularly.
>
> In fact, currently, the only falter is with screen resolutions other than
> 1024x768 with IE on teh Mac, in those instances the Flash file will be
> positioned in the top left hand corner...at least until I can get a screen
> shot of of IE on teh Mac at resolutions other than 1024x768.
>
>>>>No kook out now, just post the list.
>
>>> I think you need to make some changes first, start by downloading
>>> FireFox, then you'll need to uninstall Linux and install Windows...or
>>> learn how to compile binaries.
>
>>I'm not downgrading, I have Firefox, if your site works (which it
>>doesn't) post your challenge list, otherwise STFU.
>
> http://www.backwater-productions.net/
>
> Step the fuck up, Bitch! You lose. `, )
>
> --
not bad it works, actually its pretty good, but you will want to do
something about the load time, as it is it takes too long to load, clients
will lose interest, 25 seconds is a bit long you know (40 seconds through
my proxy, i know i should have a faster proxy but its generally fine as is
for surfing)
and before you say its my connection, at 7Mb/sec its probably not on my
end
also, on the "our sites" and "client sites" sections, perhaps a small
index might help so that people know there are more pages for them to
scroll over to; just having the arrow in the bottom right leaves its a
little ambiguous
--
Solbarth
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|